Hydrocodone-Ibuprofen (hydrocodone/ibuprofen)
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory (NSAID) and Salicylates Oral Tablet
Last reviewed · Source: First Databank (FDB) drug data
Overview
Hydrocodone bitartrate is a phenanthrene-derivative opioid agonist.
Ibuprofen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAIA) that exhibits analgesic and antipyretic activity.
Hydrocodone bitartrate is a phenanthrene-derivative opioid agonist that is used as an analgesic and antitussive agent. Hydrocodone is a full opioid agonist with relative selectivity for the mu-opioid receptor, although it can interact with other opioid receptors at higher doses. The principal therapeutic action of hydrocodone is analgesia; however, the precise mechanism of analgesic action is unknown.
Specific CNS opioid receptors for endogenous compounds with opioid-like activity have been identified throughout the brain and spinal cord and are thought to play a role in the analgesic effects of this drug. Like all full opioid agonists, there is no ceiling effect for analgesia with hydrocodone. Clinically, dosage is titrated to provide adequate analgesia and may be limited by adverse reactions, including respiratory and CNS depression.
Hydrocodone produces respiratory depression by direct action on brainstem respiratory centers. Other opioid-induced effects may include a reduction in biliary and pancreatic secretions, spasm of sphincter of Oddi, and transient elevations in serum amylase. Cardiovascular effects of the drug include peripheral vasodilation, which may result in orthostatic hypotension or syncope, inhibition of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), cortisol, and luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion, and stimulation of prolactin, growth hormone, and pancreatic secretion of insulin and glucagon.
Hydrocodone is believed to act centrally on the cough center, which may contribute to its therapeutic effects in the management of cough; however, the exact mechanism is not known.
Overall systemic exposure or bioavailability of hydrocodone bitartrate following administration as extended-release capsules or tablets is similar to that observed following administration of immediate-release fixed-combination preparations containing the drug in the same or similar dosage; however, peak plasma concentrations of the drug are lower with the extended-release formulations. Peak plasma concentrations of hydrocodone are attained approximately 5 hours after administration as extended-release capsules, and 6-30 hours after administration as extended-release tablets. After administration of the extended-release capsules for 7 days, AUC and peak concentrations of hydrocodone are approximately 2-fold higher than values attained on the first day of administration.
Administration of the extended-release capsules with food does not substantially affect the extent of absorption, although peak plasma hydrocodone concentrations were increased by 27% following administration of a 20-mg dose of the extended-release capsules with a high-fat meal.
After single-dose administration of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets, peak concentrations and AUC of the drug increased linearly and in a slightly more than dose-proportional manner over the dose range of 20-120 mg. With once-daily dosing, peak plasma concentrations and AUC were 1.1- and 1.3-fold higher at steady state. Higher doses (80 or 120 mg versus 30 mg) produced larger fluctuations in peak-to-trough plasma concentrations of the drug.
Although administration of the 120-mg extended-release tablets with a high-fat meal increased peak plasma concentrations by 54% compared with administration in the fasted state, AUC was increased by only 20% and the manufacturer states that the extended-release tablets may be administered without regard to meals.
Hydrocodone is metabolized by N-demethylation, O-demethylation, and 6-keto reduction to the corresponding 6-alpha- and 6-beta-hydroxy metabolites. Hydrocodone is metabolized principally by cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme 3A4 to form norhydrocodone (N-demethylation) and to a lesser extent by CYP2D6 to form hydromorphone (O-demethylation). Hydromorphone accounts for less than 3% of the circulating parent drug, but may contribute to the total analgesic effect of hydrocodone.
Hydrocodone and its metabolites are eliminated mainly in urine; only about 6.5% of an administered dose is excreted as unchanged drug. About 99% of an administered dose is eliminated within 72 hours. The mean plasma half-life is approximately 7-9 hours after oral administration as extended-release capsules or tablets.
Hydrocodone is about 36% bound to plasma proteins.
Ibuprofen is a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agent (NSAIA) that has pharmacologic actions similar to those of other prototypical NSAIAs. Ibuprofen demonstrates anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic activity. The exact mechanisms of action of the drug have not been clearly established, but many of the actions appear to be associated with the inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis from arachidonic acid in a process mediated by the cyclooxygenase enzymes.
Prostaglandins are inflammatory mediators, and induce pain in animal models by sensitizing afferent nerves and potentiating the action of bradykinin. Ibuprofen, like other prototypical NSAIAs, inhibits both cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) and -2 (COX-2). In patients with primary dysmenorrhea, ibuprofen has reduced resting and active intrauterine pressure and the frequency of uterine contractions, probably as a result of inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis.
It appears that ibuprofen's inhibitory effect on platelet aggregation is of shorter duration and less pronounced than that of aspirin. Patients who may be adversely affected by a prolongation of bleeding time should be carefully observed during ibuprofen therapy.
In many premature neonates, administration of ibuprofen results in closure of the persistently patent ductus arteriosus, although the mechanism of action by which ibuprofen facilitates this effect is not known.
Absorption of oral ibuprofen is rapid when administered in the fasting state. Peak plasma concentrations of ibuprofen are attained 1-2 hours after oral administration. Absorption rate is slower and plasma concentrations are reduced when ibuprofen is taken with food; however, the extent of absorption is not affected.
When the drug is administered with food, peak plasma ibuprofen concentrations are reduced by 30-50% and time to achieve peak plasma concentrations is delayed by 30-60 minutes. Absorption of ibuprofen does not appear to be affected by concomitant administration of antacids containing aluminum hydroxide or magnesium hydroxide.
Following oral administration of a 200-mg dose in adults or a 10-mg/kg dose in febrile children, peak plasma concentrations and plasma AUCs of ibuprofen appear to be increased in children compared with those achieved in adults; these differences appear to result from age- or fever-related changes in the volume of distribution in children and also to the variability of doses (based on body weight) administered to pediatric patients. Ibuprofen is dose proportional at oral dosages of 5 and 10 mg/kg in febrile children. In adults, single oral doses of up to 800 mg are dose proportional based on AUC.
Above 800 mg, AUC increases are less than dose proportional. In children, pharmacokinetics (based on AUC and peak plasma concentrations) of IV ibuprofen are similar between children 3 months to <6 months of age and children 6 months to <2 years of age. Approximately 99% of a dose is bound to plasma proteins; protein binding appears to be saturable, and at concentrations exceeding 20 mcg/mL, such binding is nonlinear.
Plasma concentrations of ibuprofen appear to decline in a biphasic manner with a half-life of approximately 2 hours. The terminal elimination half-life of orally administered ibuprofen in children reportedly is similar to that in adults; however, total clearance may be affected by age or fever. It has been suggested that changes in total clearance may result from changes in the volume of distribution in febrile children.
The terminal elimination half-life is at least tenfold longer in premature neonates than in adults. The elimination half-life in pediatric patients receiving IV ibuprofen is shorter than that observed in adults. Following IV administration of 10-mg/kg doses of ibuprofen, the mean half-life was 1.5-1.6 hours in pediatric patients 2-16 years of age, 1.8 hours in those 6 months to <2 years of age, and 1.3 hours in those 3 months to <6 months of age; the volume of distribution and clearance increased with age.
Ibuprofen is metabolized mainly via cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme 2C9-mediated hydroxylation of R- and S-ibuprofen. The S-isomer is clinically active, while the R-isomer is considered clinically inactive and undergoes conversion to the active S-isomer. Approximately 10-15% of an ibuprofen dose is excreted renally.
Excretion of ibuprofen is essentially complete within 24 hours following oral administration. Following oral administration of ibuprofen, approximately 80% of the dose is recovered in urine as the hydroxy- and carboxyl metabolites; ibuprofen undergoes further conjugation to acyl glucuronides. Metabolism and excretion of ibuprofen in premature neonates have not been evaluated.
Renal function and enzymes associated with drug metabolism are underdeveloped in neonates at birth, and increase substantially in the days after birth.
Ibuprofen is used orally for the symptomatic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile arthritis, and osteoarthritis. Ibuprofen also is used orally to relieve mild to moderate pain, to manage primary dysmenorrhea, and to reduce fever.
Generic name: hydrocodone/ibuprofen
Pronunciation: (HYE-droe-KOE-done/EYE-bue-proe-fen)
Drug class: Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory (NSAID) and Salicylates
Therapeutic class: Analgesic, Anti-inflammatory or Antipyretic
Reference product & biosimilars
No reference, biosimilar or interchangeable associated with this drug.
Today’s intelligence on Hydrocodone-Ibuprofen
Indications
The following indications are listed for Hydrocodone-Ibuprofen:
- Pain
Dosing
Dosage of hydrocodone bitartrate and hydrocodone polistirex is expressed in terms of hydrocodone bitartrate.
To minimize the potential risk of adverse cardiovascular and/or GI events, use the lowest possible effective dosage and shortest duration of therapy consistent with treatment goals of the patient. Dosage of ibuprofen must be carefully adjusted according to individual requirements and response, using the lowest possible effective dosage.
Dosage of ibuprofen lysine is expressed in terms of ibuprofen.
Hydrocodone-containing preparations are administered orally.
Hydrocodone bitartrate is commercially available as single-entity extended-release tablets or capsules and in various fixed-combination oral preparations with acetaminophen, ibuprofen, or aspirin for the management of pain. Hydrocodone bitartrate is also commercially available in various fixed combination preparations with chlorpheniramine or homatropine methylbromide for the management of cough. See the full prescribing information for additional information on fixed combination preparations.
Store hydrocodone extended-release capsules and tablets at 25degreesC (excursions permitted between 15-30degreesC) in tight, light-resistant containers in a secure location.
Ibuprofen is administered orally or IV. Ibuprofen lysine is administered IV.
Ibuprofen is also commercially available in the following fixed-combination tablets for oral use: ibuprofen and famotidine (Duexis(R)); ibuprofen and hydrocodone bitartrate. See the full prescribing information for administration of each of these combination products.
Ibuprofen is also commercially available in various over-the-counter (OTC) preparations as a single ingredient or in combination with other analgesics (e.g., acetaminophen), antihistamines, or decongestants. See the FDA Orange Book and the manufacturer's Drug Facts for further information.
| Drug label | Dosing type | Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone-Ibuprofen 7.5-200 | Maintenance | Take 1 tablet by oral route every 4-6 hours as needed for pain not toexceed 5 tablets in 24hrs. |
| Drug label | Dosing type | Instructions |
|---|---|---|
| Hydrocodone-Ibuprofen 7.5-200 | Maintenance | Take 1 tablet by oral route every 4-6 hours as needed for pain not toexceed 5 tablets in 24hrs. |
Drug interactions
Ibuprofen is metabolized mainly via cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzyme 2C9-mediated hydroxylation of R- and S-ibuprofen. There is no evidence of enzyme induction.
Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
Agents Affecting Growth Hormone/Macimorelin
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Agents affecting growth hormone may impact the accuracy of the macimorelin diagnostic test.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of agents affecting growth hormone may impact the accuracy of the macimorelin diagnostic test.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US manufacturer of macimorelin states concurrent use with agents affecting growth hormone may impact the accuracy of the macimorelin diagnostic test. Discontinue growth hormone products at least 1 week before administering the macimorelin diagnostic test. Sufficient washout time of drugs affecting growth hormone release prior to administration of macimorelin is recommended.(1) Agents affecting growth hormone include: - Drugs that directly affect the pituitary secretion of growth hormone (e.g. somatostatin, insulin, glucocorticoids, cyclooxygenase inhibitors) - Drugs that may transiently elevate growth hormone concentrations (e.g. clonidine, levodopa, insulin) - Drugs that may blunt the growth hormone response (e.g. muscarinic antagonists, anti-thyroid medications, growth hormone products)
DISCUSSION: Concurrent use of agents affecting growth hormone may impact the accuracy of the macimorelin diagnostic test.(1)
Nsaid; Aspirin (>300Mg); Salicylat/Ketorolac (Non-Injection)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Possible additive or synergistic side effects.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of multiple doses of ketorolac with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), salicylates or aspirin may result in an increase in NSAID-related side effects such as bleeding or renal impairment.(1-3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients with pre-existing renal impairment may be at an increased risk of adverse effects from this interaction. The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Manufacturers of ketorolac state that concurrent use of ketorolac with either other NSAIDs or aspirin is contraindicated.(1,2) If concurrent therapy is deemed medically necessary, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Conduct periodic monitoring of renal function, especially in patients with renal impairment. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Based upon similar pharmacodynamic effects and potentially cumulative risks of serious NSAID-related adverse events, manufacturers of ketorolac state the concurrent administration of ketorolac with other NSAIDs or aspirin is contraindicated.(1,2)
Nsaids; Aspirin (>300 Mg); Salicylate/Ketorolac (Injectable)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Possible additive or synergistic side effects.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of multiple doses of ketorolac with other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs), salicylates or aspirin may result in an increase in NSAID-related side effects such as bleeding or renal impairment.(1-3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients with pre-existing renal impairment may be at an increased risk of adverse effects from this interaction. The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The manufacturer of ketorolac states that concurrent use of ketorolac with either other NSAIDs, salicylates or aspirin is contraindicated.(1) If concurrent therapy is deemed medically necessary, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Manufacturers of ketorolac state that concurrent use of ketorolac with either other NSAIDs, salicylates or aspirin is contraindicated.(1,2) If concurrent therapy is deemed medically necessary, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Conduct periodic monitoring of renal function, especially in patients with renal impairment.
Opioid Analgesics/Opioid Antagonists
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Naltrexone, nalmefene, and samidorphan are opioid antagonists and thus inhibit the effects of opioid analgesics.(1-3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent administration or the administration of naltrexone within 7-10 days of opioids may induce acute abstinence syndrome or exacerbate a pre-existing subclinical abstinence syndrome.(1,4) Patients taking naltrexone may not experience beneficial effects of opioid-containing medications.(4) Samidorphan can precipitate opioid withdrawal in patients who are dependent on opioids. In patients who use opioids, delay initiation of samidorphan for a minimum of 7 days after last use of short-acting opioids and 14 days after last use of long-acting opioids.(3) Concurrent use of nalmefene tablets with opioid agonists may prevent the beneficial effects of the opioid.(2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The manufacturer of naltrexone states that the administration of naltrexone concurrently with opioids or to patients dependent on opioids is contraindicated.(1,4) Patients previously dependent on short-acting opioids should be opioid-free for a minimum of seven to ten days before beginning naltrexone therapy. Patients previously on buprenorphine or methadone may be vulnerable to withdrawal symptoms for as long as 2 weeks.(1,4) The manufacturer of naltrexone states that the naloxone challenge test, described in the naltrexone prescribing information, can be administered to determine if patients are opioid free.(1) The manufacturer of samidorphan states the concurrent use of samidorphan in patients using opioids or undergoing acute opioid withdrawal is contraindicated. Prior to initiating samidorphan, there should be at least a 7-day opioid free interval from the last use of short-acting opioids, and at least a 14-day opioid free interval from the last use of long-acting opioids.(3) The UK manufacturer of nalmefene tablets (for reduction of alcohol consumption) states the concurrent use of opioid analgesics is contraindicated.(2) Suspend the use of nalmefene tablets for 7 days prior to the anticipated use of opioids (e.g., elective surgery).(2)
DISCUSSION: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-control study evaluated pain relief and side effects of 35 opioid-naive patients undergoing cesarean section. All patients received spinal anesthesia (bupivacaine and morphine) and were randomized to also receive placebo, naltrexone 3 mg, or naltrexone 6 mg. Patients treated with naltrexone experienced shorter duration of pain relief (not statistically significant), however incidence of opioid-induced side effects was reduced. Patients in the naltrexone 6 mg group had lower rates of pruritus, vomiting, and somnolence (all statistically significant) compared to the placebo group.(5) In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-control trial ten recreational opioid users were studied to determine the effects of hydromorphone (4 mg and 16 mg), tramadol (87.5 mg, 175 mg, and 350 mg), and placebo after pretreatment with naltrexone (50 mg) or placebo. Results show that lower doses of hydromorphone and tramadol acted similar to placebo. Hydromorphone 16 mg alone caused euphoria and miosis which were blocked by naltrexone. Tramadol 350 mg produced a lower magnitude of euphoria and miosis compared to hydromorphone. Naltrexone partially diminished the euphoria caused by tramadol, while it enhanced some of the unpleasant monoaminergic effects (flushing, malaise, vomiting).(6) A case report describes a 28 year-old ex-heroin addict who was stable on methadone 100 mg daily and simultaneously stopped using heroin and began drinking alcohol. He was admitted to the hospital for alcohol detoxification and, by mistake, was given naltrexone 100 mg instead of methadone 100 mg. The patient experienced withdrawal symptoms including chills, agitation, muscle and abdominal pain, generalized piloerection, and dilated pupils. Treatment of withdrawal was titrated to treat symptoms and required administration 78 mg of parenteral hydromorphone, after which the patient experienced relief for the following six hours.(8) Intentional administration of an opioid antagonist, naloxone, with opioid analgesics has been performed with close monitoring to lower required opioid dose by inducing withdrawal. Three case reports describe patients who had improved pain relief on significantly reduced doses of opioid analgesics.(8) In a double-blind controlled trial, 267 trauma patients were randomized to receive 0.05 mg/kg intravenous morphine either alone or in combination with 5 mg naltrexone oral suspension. Evaluated endpoints include reduction of pain and incidence of side effects. Results indicate that ultra-low dose naltrexone does not alter opioid requirements for pain control, but does lower incidence of nausea [2 (1.16%) vs 16 (11.6%), p<0.001].(9)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Bacitracin
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bacitracin may cause renal failure due to glomerular and tubular necrosis. Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive renal toxicity.(1-3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of bacitracin with other potentially nephrotoxic agents may result in renal toxicity.(1-3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Dehydration and high-dose bacitracin may predispose to adverse renal effects.(1)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Health Canada states that bacitracin is contraindicated in patients with renal impairment, including those taking other nephrotoxic drugs.(1) The Canadian and US manufacturers of bacitracin state that concomitant use of bacitracin with other potentially nephrotoxic agents should be avoided.(2,3)
DISCUSSION: Renal impairment is a major toxicity of bacitracin. Cases of nephrotoxicity have been reported when bacitracin was used off-label.(1-3)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Cidofovir
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Cidofovir is nephrotoxic. Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function.(1-3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of cidofovir with nephrotoxic agents such as adefovir, intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, foscarnet, intravenous pentamidine, tenofovir, vancomycin, voclosporin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents may result in renal toxicity.(1-3) Other nephrotoxic agents include capreomycin, cisplatin, gallium nitrate, high-dose methotrexate, and streptozocin.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The Australian,(1) UK,(2) and US(3) manufacturers of cidofovir state that concurrent administration of potentially nephrotoxic agents such as adefovir, intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, foscarnet, intravenous pentamidine, tenofovir, vancomycin, voclosporin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents may result in renal toxicity.(1-3) Other nephrotoxic agents include capreomycin, cisplatin, gallium nitrate, high-dose methotrexate, and streptozocin. These agents should be discontinued at least 7 days before the administration of cidofovir.
DISCUSSION: The safety of cidofovir has not been studied in patients receiving other known potentially nephrotoxic agents. Renal impairment is the major toxicity of cidofovir.(1-3)
Selected Opioids/Mifepristone
SEVERITY LEVEL: 1-Contraindicated Drug Combination: This drug combination is contraindicated and generally should not be dispensed or administered to the same patient.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Mifepristone is an inhibitor of CYP3A4 and may increase levels and effects of drugs metabolized by this enzyme, including alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil are particularly susceptible to significant toxicity, including profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1,2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Due to the need for continuous therapy and mifepristone's long half-life of 85 hours(1) which leads to accumulation, patients with endogenous Cushing's syndrome may be at an increased risk for toxicity.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US manufacturer of mifepristone for hypercortisolism due to endogenous Cushing's syndrome states use with CYP3A4 substrates with a narrow therapeutic range, including alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil, is contraindicated.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(3) If concomitant use is unavoidable, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness. Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(4)
DISCUSSION: Administration of mifepristone 1200 mg daily for 10 days followed by a single dose of simvastatin 80 mg led to an increase of simvastatin and simvastatin acid (active metabolite) area-under-curve (AUC) of 10.4-fold and 15.7-fold, respectively.(1) Mifepristone is a time- and concentration-dependent CYP3A4 inhibitor. Single dose mifepristone 200 mg may have a lower risk of inhibiting the metabolism of CYP3A4 substrates, including selected opioids.
Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
Acetaminophen; Nsaids/Alprostadil
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Alprostadil is a prostaglandin E1 product used to maintain patency of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).(1) Acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) agents inhibit prostaglandins and may be used for PDA closure in addition to pain/fever management.(2-4)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Simultaneous administration of acetaminophen or NSAIDs may result in decreased clinical effects from alprostadil, including reduction in PDA.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid concurrent administration of acetaminophen or NSAIDs in patients on alprostadil for maintaining patency of a patent ductus arteriosus (PDA).(1)
DISCUSSION: NSAIDs and acetaminophen are used as management for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) closure.(2-4) Alprostadil is used to maintain patency of a PDA.(1) In a case report, a 37-week gestational age neonate with cardiac defects required alprostadil therapy for PDA patency. After multiple doses of acetaminophen for pain, an echocardiogram showed reduction of the PDA requiring increased doses of alprostadil. Additional acetaminophen was discontinued. Follow up echocardiogram showed successful reversal of PDA reduction and alprostadil dose was reduced.(5)
Agents That May Cause Respiratory Depression/Sodium Oxybate
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Oxybate by itself may be associated with severe somnolence or respiratory depression. Concurrent use with other CNS depressants may further increase the risk for respiratory depression or loss of consciousness.(1-3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of sodium oxybate and sedative hypnotics or alcohol may further increase the risk for profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1,2) Fatalities have been reported.(3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Based upon FDA evaluation of deaths in patients taking sodium oxybate, risk factors may include: use of multiple drugs which depress the CNS, more rapid than recommended oxybate dose titration, exceeding the maximum recommended oxybate dose, and prescribing for unapproved uses such as fibromyalgia, insomnia or migraine. Note that in oxybate clinical trials for narcolepsy 78% - 85% of patients were also receiving concomitant CNS stimulants.(1-3)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid use of concomitant opioids, benzodiazepines, sedating antidepressants, sedating antipsychotics, general anesthetics, or muscle relaxants, particularly when predisposing risk factors are present. If combination use is required, dose reduction or discontinuation of one or more CNS depressants should be considered. If short term use of an opioid or general anesthetic is required, consider interruption of sodium oxybate treatment.(1,2) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(4) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(5)
DISCUSSION: The FDA evaluated sodium oxybate postmarket fatal adverse event reports from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System(AERS)and from the manufacturer. Although report documentation was not always optimal or complete, useful information was obtained. Factors which may have contributed to fatal outcome: concomitant use of one or more drugs which depress the CNS, more rapid than recommended oxybate dose titration, exceeding the maximum recommended oxybate dose, and prescribing for unapproved uses such as fibromyalgia, insomnia or migraine. Many deaths occurred in patients with serious psychiatric disorders such as depression and substance abuse. Other concomitant diseases may have also contributed to respiratory and CNS depressant effects of oxybate.(3)
Anticholinergics; Opioids/Eluxadoline
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Eluxadoline is a mixed mu-opioid and kappa-opioid agonist and delta-opioid antagonist and may alter or slow down gastrointestinal transit.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Constipation related adverse events that sometimes required hospitalization have been reported, including the development of intestinal obstruction, intestinal perforation, and fecal impaction.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid use with other drugs that may cause constipation. If concurrent use is necessary, evaluate the patient's bowel function regularly. Monitor for symptoms of constipation and GI hypomotility, including having bowel movements less than three times weekly or less than usual, difficulty having a bowel movement or passing gas, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain or distention.(1) Instruct patients to stop eluxadoline and immediately contact their healthcare provider if they experience severe constipation. Loperamide may be used occasionally for acute management of severe diarrhea, but must be discontinued if constipation develops.(1)
DISCUSSION: In phase 3 clinical trials, constipation was the most commonly reported adverse reaction (8%). Approximately 50% of constipation events occurred within the first 2 weeks of treatment while the majority occurred within the first 3 months of therapy. Rates of severe constipation were less than 1% in patients receiving eluxadoline doses of 75 mg and 100 mg.(1)
Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets; Thrombolytics/Caplacizumab
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bleeding has been reported with the use of caplacizumab.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of caplacizumab with anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or thrombolytics may increase the risk of hemorrhage.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. hemophilia, coagulation factor deficiencies). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid the use of caplacizumab with anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and thrombolytics. Interrupt caplacizumab therapy if clinically significant bleeding occurs. Patients may require von Willebrand factor concentrate to rapidly correct hemostasis. If caplacizumab is restarted, closely monitor for signs of bleeding.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: Bleeding has been reported with caplacizumab. In clinical studies, severe bleeding adverse reactions of epistaxis, gingival bleeding, upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, and metrorrhagia were each reported in 1% of patients. Overall, bleeding events occurred in approximately 58% of patients on caplacizumab versus 43% of patients on placebo.(1) In post-marketing reports, cases of life-threatening and fatal bleeding were reported with caplacizumab.(1)
Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs/Inotersen
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Inotersen causes reductions in platelet count that may result in sudden and unpredictable thrombocytopenia. Inotersen can also cause glomerulonephritis and renal toxicity. NSAIDs can impair thromboxane-dependent platelet aggregation by blocking the formation of thromboxane A2. Concurrent administration with NSAIDs may also result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of inotersen with NSAIDs may result in additive or synergistic effects, including fatal and non-fatal intracranial hemorrhage, or renal toxicity.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may also be greater in patients greater than 60 years or have a prior history of major bleeding events. Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding. Patients with pre-existing renal impairment.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Inotersen should be administered with caution in patients receiving NSAIDs. If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Monitor platelet count frequently. If platelet count is less than 50, stop inotersen treatment and consider discontinuation of NSAID. Monitor for signs and symptoms of thrombocytopenia; such as, unusual or prolonged bleeding (petechiae, easy bruising, hematoma, subconjunctival bleeding, gingival bleeding, epistaxis, hemoptysis, irregular or heavier than normal menstrual bleeding, hematemesis, hematuria, hematochezia, melena), neck stiffness, or atypical severe headache. Monitor renal function closely.
DISCUSSION: In a clinical study, platelet counts below 100 occurred in 25% of inotersen-treated patients, compared with 2% of patients on placebo. Platelet counts below 75 occurred in 14% of inotersen-treated patients, compared to no patients on placebo. In study 1 and its extension study, 39% of inotersen-treated patients with a baseline platelet count below 200 had a nadir platelet count below 75, compared to 6% of patients with baseline platelet counts 200 or higher. Three inotersen-treated patients (3%) had sudden severe thrombocytopenia (platelet count below 25). One patient experienced a fatal intracranial hemorrhage.(1) The safety of inotersen has not been studied in patients receiving other known potentially nephrotoxic agents.(1) Inotersen is only available through a Tegsedi REMS program because of the risk of severe thrombocytopenia and the risk of glomerulonephritis.(1)
Nsaids/Methotrexate; Pralatrexate
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown. NSAID-induced inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis may decrease renal perfusion rate and therefore inhibit methotrexate and pralatrexate clearance. NSAIDs may also compete for renal secretion with methotrexate and pralatrexate. Since methotrexate is not extensively protein bound, displacement of methotrexate by NSAIDs is unlikely to have altered methotrexate kinetics.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Increased levels of methotrexate and pralatrexate, with increased effects, leading to increased risk of severe neurotoxicity, stomatitis, and myelosuppression, including neutropenia.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Risk factors for methotrexate toxicity include: - High-dose oncology regimens - Impaired renal function, ascites, or pleural effusions
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid the use of NSAIDs with high dose methotrexate therapy.(1) If both drugs must be given, monitor methotrexate levels and patient response carefully. Consider extending leucovorin rescue duration. Use caution when administering NSAIDs with low dose methotrexate therapy. (1) Administration of NSAIDs with pralatrexate requires close monitoring for toxicity.(2)
DISCUSSION: A retrospective review documented four cases of methotrexate toxicity during concurrent administration of ketoprofen and methotrexate in 36 patients. Three cases were fatalities.(3) In contrast, a four-way cross-over study in ten subjects found no effect on methotrexate oral or renal clearance by ketoprofen, piroxicam, or flurbiprofen.(4) In a study in 19 subjects, the concurrent administration of methotrexate and piroxicam resulted in a decrease in methotrexate maximum concentration (Cmax) but no other changes in methotrexate kinetics.(5) Another three-way cross-over study in six patients showed no effect by flurbiprofen or ibuprofen on methotrexate kinetics.(6) In contrast, administration of ibuprofen to nine patients resulted in a 39% decrease in methotrexate total clearance and a 40% decrease in methotrexate renal clearance.(7) Information on naproxen is also conflicting. In another arm of the earlier study (7), the administration of naproxen in nine patients decreased methotrexate total clearance by 22%, but had no significant effects on methotrexate renal clearance. In another study in nine subjects, methotrexate altered naproxen kinetics by greater than 30% in six subjects, although these changes were not statistically significant. Naproxen altered methotrexate kinetics by greater than 30% in four subjects, although these changes were also not statistically significant.(8) In contrast, the administration of naproxen with methotrexate in 15 subjects showed no significant effects on methotrexate oral or renal clearance.(9) A study in 19 subjects found that the concurrent administration of etodolac and methotrexate decreased methotrexate Cmax and increased methotrexate mean residence time. There were no changes in methotrexate clearance or area-under-curve (AUC) and no toxicity was observed.(10) A study in 12 patients showed no significant effects of sulindac on methotrexate kinetics unless one patient who had low baseline clearance of methotrexate was excluded from analysis.(11) A study in seven children examined the effects of the children's usual NSAID on methotrexate kinetics. NSAIDs were naproxen, tolmetin, and indomethacin. Methotrexate half-life increased during NSAID administration. There were no significant changes in methotrexate clearance, AUC or volume of distribution. There was inter-subject variably in response. In six of seven patients, NSAID administration increased methotrexate AUC 19-140%.(12) Case reports have documented an interaction between methotrexate and phenylbutazone (13), indomethacin (14), flurbiprofen (15), and naproxen (16,17); however, one naproxen report (16) is complicated by the fact that the patient took 27.5 mg methotrexate in one week instead of 2.5 mg three times weekly. Because of the conflicting data and wide patient variability, caution is warranted during concurrent administration of methotrexate and any NSAID.
Nsaids/Selected Anticoagulants (Vit K Antagonists)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown. Some NSAIDs may displace anticoagulants from plasma protein binding sites. NSAIDs also have the potential to produce gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding. Some NSAIDs may impair platelet function and prolong bleeding times.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of anticoagulants and NSAIDs may increase the risk for bleeding.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Bleeding risk may be increased in patients with renal impairment and in patients older than 75 years. The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., other anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: If concurrent therapy with anticoagulants and NSAIDs is warranted, patients should be closely monitored for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin and/or hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: The effects of NSAIDs on the hypoprothrombinemic response to anticoagulants appears to vary between patients as well as with different NSAIDs. Documentation is frequently contradictory - while studies have shown several NSAIDs to have no effect on the pharmacokinetics of warfarin, case reports have documented increased effects with and without bleeding when these same NSAIDs were administered concurrently with warfarin. While celecoxib has been shown not to affect platelet aggregation or bleeding times and had no effects on the anticoagulant effect of warfarin in healthy subjects, increased prothrombin times and bleeding episodes, some of which were fatal, have been reported, predominantly in the elderly, in patients receiving concurrent therapy with celecoxib and warfarin. Rofecoxib has been shown to increase prothrombin times in subjects who received concurrent warfarin therapy. A post hoc analysis of nonselective NSAIDs in the RE-LY study (compared dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice daily with warfarin in atrial fibrillation) assessed clinical outcomes by comparing nonselective NSAID use (at least once during trial) with no NSAID use in 2279 patients. The use of NSAIDs was associated an increased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) 1.68), gastrointestinal major bleeding (HR 1.81), stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.50), and hospitalization (HR 1.64).(22) A self-controlled case study of 1,622 oral anticoagulant-precipitant drug pairs were reviewed and found 14% of drug pairs were associated with a statistically significant elevated risk of thromboembolism. Concurrent use of warfarin and sulindac resulted in a ratio of rate ratios (RR) (95% CI) of 3.7 (1.79-7.62); warfarin and etodolac ratio of RR 2.61 (1.6-4.25); warfarin and ibuprofen ratio of RR 1.94 (1.5-2.5); warfarin and naproxen ratio of RR 1.72 (1.35-2.19); warfarin and indomethacin ratio of RR 1.62 (1.03-2.55); warfarin and diclofenac ratio of RR 1.43 (1.07-1.92; warfarin and celecoxib ratio of RR 1.24 (1.02-1.53); and warfarin and meloxicam ratio of RR 1.23 (1.02-1.47).(23) In a nationwide cohort study, patients were evaluated for thromboembolic cardiovascular and clinically relevant bleeding events with concurrent antithrombotic and ongoing NSAID treatment. A total of 108,232 patients were followed for a mean of 2.3 +/- 1.8 years after diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Concomitant NSAID treatment significantly increased the risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR) 6.96; 95% CI 6.24 - 6.77; p<0.001) and bleeding events (HR 4.08; 95% CI 3.51 - 4.73; p<0.001) compared to no NSAID treatment. NSAIDs were further evaluated and revealed the use of celecoxib (HR: 4.65; 95% CI: 3.17 to 6.82; p < 0.001, and 3.44; 95% CI: 2.20 to 5.39; p < 0.001, respectively) and meloxicam (HR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.47; p < 0.001, and 2.80; 95% CI: 1.40 to 5.60; p < 0.001, respectively) had the lowest risk for cardiovascular and bleeding events, receptively. A large systematic review was performed on 72 warfarin drug-drug interactions studies that reported on bleeding, thromboembolic events, or death. Most studies were retrospective cohorts. A meta-analysis of 8 of those studies found a higher rate of clinically significant bleeding in patients on warfarin and NSAIDs (OR=1.83; 95% CI 1.29-2.59). Increased bleeding risk was seen in subgroup analyses with non-selective NSAIDs (OR=1.86; 95% CI 1.10-3.17) and COX-2 inhibitors (OR=1.81; 95% CI 1.3-2.52).(24) If concurrent therapy with anticoagulants and NSAIDs is warranted, it would be prudent to monitor patients closely for increased anticoagulant effects.
Nsaids; Aspirin (> 100 Mg); Salicylates/Mifamurtide
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: High-dose NSAIDs or salicylates may block the macrophage activating effect of mifamurtide.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of high-dose NSAIDs or salicylates may decrease the effectiveness of mifamurtide.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The UK manufacturer of mifamurtide states that concurrent use with high-dose NSAIDs or salicylates is contraindicated.(1)
DISCUSSION: In vitro studies have shown that high-dose NSAIDs or salicylates can block the macrophage activating effect of mifamurtide.(1)
Nsaids; Salicylates/Dabigatran
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and when taken with agents that effect platelet aggregation and/or other clotting factors increased bleeding episodes can occur.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of dabigatran with NSAIDs or salicylates may result in additive or synergistic effects resulting in unwanted bleeding episodes.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Factors associated with an increased risk for bleeding include renal impairment, concomitant use of P-glycoprotein inhibitors, patient older than 74 years, coexisting conditions (e.g. recent trauma, thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease), use of drugs associated with bleeding risk (e.g. other anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)), and patient weight less than 50 kg. (1-3) Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, who use alcohol or smoke, with longer duration of NSAID use, and with prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Discontinue dabigatran in patients with active pathological bleeding.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Dabigatran is a direct thrombin inhibitor and when taken with agents that effect platelet aggregation and/or other clotting factors increased bleeding episodes can occur.(1,2) A post hoc analysis of nonselective NSAIDs in the RE-LY study (compared dabigatran 150 and 110 mg twice daily with warfarin in atrial fibrillation) assessed clinical outcomes by comparing nonselective NSAID use (at least once during trial) with no NSAID use in 2279 patients. The use of NSAIDs was associated an increased risk of major bleeding (hazard ratio (HR) 1.68), gastrointestinal major bleeding (HR 1.81), stroke or systemic embolism (HR 1.50), and hospitalization (HR 1.64).(22)
Nsaids; Salicylates/Selected Immunosuppressants
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Cyclosporine increases the production of prostaglandin E2 and I2. Prostaglandin E2 has been shown to prevent cyclosporine -induced renal toxicity in animals. NSAIDS and salicylates may increase cyclosporine-induced renal toxicity by blocking the formation of prostaglandins. Concurrent use of everolimus, sirolimus or tacrolimus with NSAIDs or salicylates may result in additive nephrotoxicity.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent administration of cyclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus, or tacrolimus and a NSAID or salicylate may result in a decrease in renal function, with or without an alteration in immunosuppressant levels.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: If possible, avoid the concurrent use of NSAIDs or salicylates in patients maintained on cyclosporine, everolimus, sirolimus, or tacrolimus. If concurrent therapy is warranted, patients should be monitored for a decrease in renal function. The NSAID or salicylate may need to be discontinued.
DISCUSSION: A decrease in renal function has been reported with concurrent cyclosporine and diclofenac, sulindac, mefenamic acid, ketoprofen, piroxicam, and naproxen. Decreasing the cyclosporine dose without discontinuing the NSAID does not appear to improve renal function. The use of agents which decrease renal function concurrently with everolimus, sirolimus or tacrolimus should be approached with caution. An observational study of 63 inpatient encounters for 57 transplant patients evaluated concurrent use between calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) therapy and NSAID use. Patients were matched to 126 transplant patients on CNI therapy without NSAID use. Patients who received at least one dose of NSAID had a 12.2% rate of treatment emergent acute kidney injury (AKI). The relative risk ratio for AKI in patient exposed to NSAID therapy was 2.20 (95% CI 0.74-6.54). An increase in 48 hour post NSAID exposure serum creatinine above baseline was documented in 65.9% of patients compared to 46% in the non NSAID group (p=0.016). Multivariate analysis revealed changes in serum creatinine at 48 hours after admission were independently associated with age (p=0.008) and NSAID use (p=0.026).(12)
Nsaids; Salicylates/Selected Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Abciximab, cangrelor, cilostazol, clopidogrel, dipyridamole, eptifibatide, prasugrel, ticagrelor, vorapaxar and NSAIDs or salicylates inhibit platelet aggregation.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of platelet aggregation inhibitors and NSAIDs or salicylates may increase the risk of bleeding.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., anticoagulants, other antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding. Risk increases as the number of risk factors increases.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Use caution when administering platelet aggregation inhibitors with NSAIDs or salicylates.(1-5) It would be prudent to monitor patients more closely during concurrent therapy and to use the lowest NSAID or salicylate dose possible. If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin and/or hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The 2010 ACCF/ACG/AHA Consensus guidelines recommend the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with multiple risk factors for GI bleeding who require antiplatelet therapy. However, esomeprazole and omeprazole should be avoided with clopidogrel as they are expected to reduce the effectiveness of clopidogrel. Use of other PPIs should be approached with caution, as they may reduce the effectiveness of clopidogrel.
DISCUSSION: Because of the increased risk of bleeding, caution is warranted when using this combination. In a nationwide cohort study, patients were evaluated for thromboembolic cardiovascular and clinically relevant bleeding events with concurrent antithrombotic and ongoing NSAID treatment. A total of 108,232 patients were followed for a mean of 2.3 +/- 1.8 years after diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Concomitant NSAID treatment significantly increased the risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR) 6.96; 95% CI 6.24 - 6.77; p<0.001) and bleeding events (HR 4.08; 95% CI 3.51 - 4.73; p<0.001) compared to no NSAID treatment. NSAIDs were further evaluated and revealed the use of celecoxib (HR: 4.65; 95% CI: 3.17 to 6.82; p < 0.001, and 3.44; 95% CI: 2.20 to 5.39; p < 0.001, respectively) and meloxicam (HR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.47; p < 0.001, and 2.80; 95% CI: 1.40 to 5.60; p < 0.001, respectively) had the lowest risk for cardiovascular and bleeding events, receptively.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Sodium Phosphate Bowel Cleanser
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bowel cleansing with sodium phosphate causes dehydration, decreased intravascular volume and hyperphosphatemia, which increases phosphate levels in the renal tubules. Abnormally high levels of calcium and phosphate in the renal tubules may precipitate out, resulting in renal injury.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Use of sodium phosphate for bowel cleansing in patients maintained on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may increase the risk of acute phosphate nephropathy, which is an acute kidney injury associated with deposits of calcium phosphate crystal in the renal tubules that may result in permanent renal function impairment. Acute phosphate nephropathy presents as acute kidney injury with minimal proteinuria and a bland urine sediment.(2) Use of oral sodium phosphate products at laxative doses has not been associated with acute kidney injury.(3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients who may be at an increased risk of acute phosphate nephropathy include those who are over age 55; are hypovolemic or have decreased intravascular volume; have baseline kidney disease, bowel obstruction, or active colitis; and who are using medications that affect renal perfusion or function (such as diuretics, ACE inhibitors, angiotension receptor blockers [ARBs]), and NSAIDs.(2)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: If possible, use an alternative agent for bowel cleansing.(1) Use sodium phosphate products with caution in patients taking medications that affect kidney function or perfusion, such as ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Obtain baseline and post-procedure labs (electrolytes, calcium, phosphate, BUN, creatinine, and [in smaller, frail individuals] glomerular filtration rate). Instruct patients to drink sufficient quantities of clear fluids before, during, and after bowel cleansing and to avoid other laxatives that contain sodium phosphate. Consider hospitalization and intravenous hydration during bowel cleansing to support frail patients who may be unable to drink an appropriate volume of fluid or who may be without assistance at home.(2) Use of an electrolyte solution for rehydration may decrease the risk of acute phosphate nephropathy.(4,5)
DISCUSSION: Since May 2006, the FDA has received 20 reports of acute phosphate nephropathy associated with the use of Osmo Prep. Concomitant medications included ACE inhibitors or ARBs (11), diuretics (6), and NSAIDs (4).(2) In a retrospective review of colonoscopy patients, simultaneous use of ACE inhibitors or ARBs significantly increased the risk of acute kidney injury from oral sodium phosphate. Diuretic use was also a risk factor.(6) In a case series study of 21 cases of acute phosphate nephropathy in patients who had used oral sodium phosphate, 14 patients received an ACE inhibitor or ARB, 4 used a diuretic, and 3 used an NSAID.(7) Cases have also been reported with rectal products.(8)
Nsaids;Salicylates/Apixaban;Betrixaban;Edoxaban;Rivaroxaban
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of apixaban(1-4), betrixaban(7), edoxaban(5), or rivaroxaban(6) and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents (NSAIDs) or salicylates may result in additive increased risk of bleeding.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of apixaban(1), betrixaban(7), edoxaban(5), or rivaroxaban(2) with NSAIDs or salicylates may result in unwanted bleeding episodes.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Bleeding risk may be increased in patients with renal impairment and in patients older than 75 years. The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., other anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Approach concurrent therapy with apixaban(1-4), betrixaban(7), edoxaban(5), or rivaroxaban(6) with caution. Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: In a study, naproxen (500 mg) increased apixaban (10 mg) area-under-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) by 1.5-fold an 1.6-fold, respectively, with corresponding increases in clotting tests. There were no changes in the effect of naproxen on arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation, no clinically relevant changes in bleeding times, or naproxen pharmacokinetics.(1) In a single dose study, there were no pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interactions between rivaroxaban and naproxen.(6) Although effects seen in the above studies were limited, NSAIDs are known to increase bleeding and may further increase the risk of bleeding with these agents.(1-6) In edoxaban clinical studies, concomitant use of low-dose aspirin (less than or equal to 100 mg/day) or thienopyridines, and NSAIDs was permitted and resulted in increased rates of clinically relevant bleeding.(5) In a study of 34 healthy subjects administered edoxaban 60 mg daily and naproxen 500 mg daily, bleeding time increased by 2.08-fold from baseline on the combination, compared to a 1.23-fold increase with naproxen alone and 1.7-fold increase on edoxaban alone.(8) A self-controlled case study of 1,622 oral anticoagulant-precipitant drug pairs were reviewed and found 14% of drug pairs were associated with a statistically significant elevated risk of thromboembolism. Concurrent use of apixaban and ibuprofen resulted in a ratio of rate ratios (RR) (95% CI) of 5.16 (3.0-8.85); apixaban and celecoxib ratio of RR 1.8 (1.06-3.06); rivaroxaban and etodolac ratio of RR 2.47 (1.18-4.22); rivaroxaban and naproxen ratio of RR 1.89 (1.12-1.43); and rivaroxaban and ibuprofen ratio of RR 1.68 (1.29-4.44).(9)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Colistimethate
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Colistimethate can cause nephrotoxicity.(1,2) Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in an increased risk of nephrotoxicity.(1) It is suspected that cephalothin interferes with the excretion of colistimethate resulting in enhanced nephrotoxicity.(2,3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of colistimethate with other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive nephrotoxic effects.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Factors predisposing to nephrotoxicity include higher cumulative doses of colistimethate, longer treatment duration, hypovolemia, and critical illness.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Concurrent use of potentially nephrotoxic agents with colistimethate should be avoided.(1,2) If concurrent use is necessary, it should be undertaken with great caution.(1)
DISCUSSION: In a case control study of 42 patients on intravenous colistimethate sodium, NSAIDs were identified as an independent risk factor for nephrotoxicity (OR 40.105, p=0.044).(4) In 4 case reports, patients developed elevated serum creatinine and blood urea nitrogen following concurrent colistimethate and cephalothin (3 patients) or when colistimethate followed cephalothin therapy (1 patient).(3) A literature review found that individual nephrotoxic agents, including aminoglycosides, vancomycin, amphotericin, IV contrast, diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, NSAIDs, and calcineurin inhibitors, were not consistently associated with additive nephrotoxicity when used with colistimethate. However, when multiple agents (at least 2 additional potential nephrotoxins) were used concurrently, there was a significant correlation to colistimethate nephrotoxicity.(5)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Foscarnet
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Foscarnet is nephrotoxic. Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function.(1) Concurrent intravenous pentamidine may also result in hypocalcemia.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of foscarnet with nephrotoxic agents such as acyclovir, adefovir, intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cyclosporine, methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, intravenous pentamidine, tacrolimus, tenofovir, vancomycin and voclosporin may result in renal toxicity.(1) Other nephrotoxic agents include capreomycin, cisplatin, gallium nitrate, high-dose methotrexate, and streptozocin.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US manufacturer of foscarnet state that concurrent administration of potentially nephrotoxic agents such as acyclovir, intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cyclosporine, methotrexate, tacrolimus, and intravenous pentamidine should be avoided.(1) Other nephrotoxic agents include adefovir, capreomycin, cisplatin, gallium nitrate, high-dose methotrexate, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, streptozocin, tenofovir, vancomycin and voclosporin. If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor renal function closely. In patients receiving concurrent foscarnet and pentamidine, also monitor serum calcium levels and instruct patients to report severe muscle spasms, mental/mood changes, and/or seizures.(1)
DISCUSSION: The safety of foscarnet has not been studied in patients receiving other known potentially nephrotoxic agents. Renal impairment is the major toxicity of foscarnet.(1)
Selected Nsaids; Aspirin (>325 Mg)/Pemetrexed
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: NSAIDs may decrease the clearance of pemetrexed.(1) This decreased clearance may be the result of chronic renal toxicity from NSAIDs or NSAIDs may compete with pemetrexed for tubular secretion.(2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of pemetrexed and NSAIDs may result in elevated levels of and toxicity from pemetrexed, including myelosuppression, neutropenia, renal toxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: This interaction is expected to be more severe in patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency (creatinine clearance (CrCl) of 45 ml/min to 79 ml/min) and/or patients taking long acting NSAIDs. (1)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: In patients with normal renal function (CrCl equal to or greater than 80 ml/min), ibuprofen (400 mg 4 times daily) can be administered with pemetrexed. Aspirin in low to moderate doses (325 mg every 6 hours) does not affect the pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed.(1) In patients with mild to moderate renal insufficiency (CrCl from 45 ml/min to 79 ml/min), NSAIDs with short half-lives should be avoided for 2 days before, the day of, and 2 days after pemetrexed administration. Ibuprofen should be administered with caution in these patients.(1) NSAIDs and salicylates with long half-lives should be avoided for at least 5 days before, the day of, and 2 days following pemetrexed administration in all patients.(1,2) If NSAIDs are required, patients should be monitored for pemetrexed toxicity, especially myelosuppression, renal toxicity, and gastrointestinal toxicity.(1)
DISCUSSION: In patients with normal renal function, ibuprofen (400 mg 4 times daily) decreased the clearance of pemetrexed by 20% and increased its area-under-curve (AUC) by 20%.(1) In a Phase I clinical trial, two patients receiving high dose pemetrexed therapy experienced severe toxicity, both were receiving a NSAID. Following these reports, all patients were required to stop aspirin or other NSAIDs 2 days before and not resume these agents until 2 days after pemetrexed.(2) In two randomized, controlled cross-over trials, 27 cancer patients with a creatinine clearance (CrCl) less than or equal to 60 ml/min received pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) infusion on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle and either aspirin 325 mg or ibuprofen 400 mg orally every 6 hours starting 2 days before pemetrexed administration. Coadministration of aspirin did not affect pemetrexed pharmacokinetics. Ibuprofen decreased the clearance of pemetrexed by 16%, increased its maximum concentration (Cmax) by 15%, and increased the AUC by 20%.(3) Aspirin products linked to this monograph are single ingredient aspirin products with greater than 325 mg strength, and aspirin combination products (e.g. opioid-aspirin or cough/cold/allergy products) with a reasonable likelihood of a total daily aspirin dose > or = 1,300 mg per day.
Selected Opioids/Ceritinib; Crizotinib
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Ceritinib(1) and crizotinib(2) inhibit CYP3A4, and thus may inhibit the metabolism of agents processed by this isoenzyme, including alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of ceritinib(1) or crizotinib(2) with alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, or sufentanil may lead to elevated drug levels and increased side effects of the opioid, including profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1-3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Avoid coadministration of sensitive or narrow therapeutic window CYP3A4 substrates such as alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, or sufentanil with ceritinib and crizotinib. If concomitant use is unavoidable, dosage adjustments of the opioid should be considered when initiating or discontinuing ceritinib(1) or crizotinib.(2) Patients maintained on ceritinib or crizotinib may need lower initial doses of opioid medications. Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(5) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for adverse affects, including unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness. Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(6)
DISCUSSION: In a study, ceritinib (750 mg daily for 3 weeks) increased the area-under-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of midazolam (a CYP3A4 substrate) by 5.4-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively, compared to midazolam alone.(1) Crizotinib (250 mg twice daily for 28 days) increased the AUC of oral midazolam by 3.7-fold.(2) Thus, ceritinib(1) and crizotinib(2) are expected to increase levels of opioids metabolized by CYP3A4.
Selected Opioids/Selected Cyp3a4 Inhibitors
SEVERITY LEVEL: 2-Severe Interaction: Action is required to reduce the risk of severe adverse interaction.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: CYP3A4 inhibitors may inhibit the metabolism of alfentanil,(1,2) benzhydrocodone,(3) fentanyl,(1,2) hydrocodone,(4) oxycodone,(5) and sufentanil.(6) Benzhydrocodone is a prodrug of hydrocodone.(3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The concurrent administration of a CYP3A4 inhibitor may result in elevated levels of and toxicity from alfentanil,(1,2) benzhydrocodone,(3) fentanyl,(1,2) hydrocodone,(4) oxycodone,(5) and sufentanil,(6) including profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Heat.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients receiving potent or moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors for an extended period of time. Dosage adjustments should be made if warranted. The manufacturer of itraconazole states that concomitant administration of fentanyl is not recommended during and 2 weeks after itraconazole treatment.(7) Avoid exposing the fentanyl patch application site and surrounding area to direct external heat sources as there have been reports of overdose and death as a result of exposure to heat. The manufacturer of sufentanil sublingual tablets states that if concomitant use with CYP3A4 inhibitors is necessary, consider use of an alternate agent that allows dose adjustment.(6) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(8) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(9)
DISCUSSION: A nested-case control study of patients who were prescribed fentanyl patches, hydromorphone, or oxycodone and were hospitalized for opioid toxicity found that, among 70 cases and 120 control patients, CYP3A4-inhibiting macrolides (erythromycin and clarithromycin) were associated with a higher risk of opioid toxicity (aOR 3.80, 95% CI: 1.36-11.56 with fentanyl; aOR 3.38, 95% CI: 1.28-8.97 with hydromorphone; aOR 3.11, 95% CI: 1.05-9.51 with oxycodone).(10) In a randomized, placebo-controlled trial in 20 healthy subjects, clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) increased the area-under-curve (AUC) of a single oral dose of oxycodone (10 mg) by 2-fold and 2.3-fold in young and elderly subjects, respectively.(11) In a controlled cross-over study in 6 subjects, 7 days of pretreatment with erythromycin decreased the clearance of alfentanil by 25%. Alfentanil half-life increased by 56%.(12) Erythromycin has been shown to inhibit fentanyl metabolism in vitro.(13) In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study in 9 subjects, single doses of intravenous fluconazole (400 mg) and oral fluconazole (400 mg) decreased the clearance of a single dose of alfentanil (20 mcg/kg) by 58% and 55%, respectively. Alfentanil half-life almost doubled after both intravenous and oral fluconazole. Both intravenous and oral fluconazole increased subjective effects of alfentanil and increased alfentanil-induced respiratory depression.(14) In a cross-over study, pretreatment with itraconazole (200 mg daily for 4 days) had no effect on a single dose of intravenous fentanyl (3 mcg/kg).(15) In a cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, itraconazole (200 mg daily for 5 days) increased the AUC and Cmax of a single oral dose of oxycodone (10 mg) by 144% and 45%, respectively. The AUC of noroxycodone decreased 49% and the AUC of oxymorphone increased 359% with concurrent itraconazole and oral oxycodone. Itraconazole increased the AUC of a single intravenous dose of oxycodone (0.1 mg/kg) by 51%.(16) In a randomized cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, ketoconazole increased the AUC of oxycodone by 2-fold to 3-fold and also increased oxycodone-related nausea, drowsiness, and pruritus.(17) In a randomized cross-over study in 10 healthy subjects, ketoconazole increased the AUC of oxymorphone by 3-fold following a single dose of oxycodone (0.2 mg/kg). Increased side effects were also noted.(18,19) Ketoconazole has been shown to inhibit the metabolism of alfentanil,(20) fentanyl,(13) and oxycodone(21) in vitro. In a study of 11 subjects, ritonavir reduced the clearance of fentanyl 67% and increased the AUC 174%. Eight subjects reported nausea during the study.(22) In a randomized cross-over study in 16 healthy subjects, ritonavir (300 mg twice daily for 4 days) and lopinavir/ritonavir (400/100 mg twice daily for 4 days) increased the AUC of a single dose of oxycodone (10 mg) by 3.0-fold and 2.6-fold, respectively. Oxycodone half-life increased 55% and 58%, respectively, with concurrent ritonavir or lopinavir/ritonavir. Both regimens also increased self-reported oxycodone effects.(23) The Australian manufacturer of ritonavir states that the AUC of fentanyl may be potentially increased 3-fold with concurrent ritonavir.(24) In a randomized cross-over study in 11 healthy subjects, telithromycin (800 mg daily for 4 days) increased the AUC of a single dose of oxycodone (10 mg immediate-release) by 80%. The AUC of noroxycodone was decreased by 46%. There was a modest increase in the pharmacodynamic effects of oxycodone.(25) In a randomized cross-over study in 10 healthy subjects, troleandomycin increased the AUC of alfentanil by 135%.(26) In a randomized cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, troleandomycin increased the AUC of a single dose of fentanyl (oral transmucosal, 10 mcg/kg) by 76%.(27) Troleandomycin has been shown to inhibit alfentanil(19) and fentanyl(28) metabolism in vitro. In a randomized, cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, concurrent use of voriconazole and alfentanil increased the AUC of alfentanil 6-fold and decreased its clearance by 85%.(25,29) In a randomized, cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, voriconazole (400 mg twice daily, Day 1; 200 mg twice daily, Day 2) and fluconazole (400 mg daily, Day 1; 200 mg daily, Day 2) decreased the clearance of a single dose of intravenous fentanyl (5 mcg/kg) by 23% and 16%, respectively.(30) In a randomized cross-over study in 12 healthy subjects, pretreatment with voriconazole for 4 days increased the AUC, Cmax, and half-life of a single dose of oxycodone (10 mg) by 3.6-fold, 1.7-fold, 2.0-fold, respectively.(31) There are case reports of interactions between alfentanil and erythromycin,(32) fentanyl and clarithromycin,(33) fentanyl and fluconazole,(34) fentanyl and itraconazole,(35) and oxycodone and voriconazole.(36) In the case report with fentanyl and fluconazole, the patient died of respiratory depression.(34) A study in healthy subjects shown that the application of heat over the fentanyl patch system increased mean overall fentanyl exposure by 120% and average maximum fentanyl level by 61%.(2) In a single dose study of sufentanil sublingual tablet 15 mcg with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole, resulted in 77% and 19% greater AUC and Cmax values of sufentanil, respectively, compared to its administration alone.(6) Strong CYP3A4 inhibitors that have been documented to interact with alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, and/or oxycodone or would be expected to interact with these agents include: boceprevir, clarithromycin, cobicistat, elvitegravir, ensitrelvir, grapefruit, idelalisib, indinavir, itraconazole, josamycin, ketoconazole, lonafarnib, lopinavir, mibefradil, nefazodone, nelfinavir, nirmatrelvir, paritaprevir, posaconazole, relacorilant, ribociclib, saquinavir, telaprevir, telithromycin, tipranavir, troleandomycin, tucatinib, voriconazole.(37) Moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors that have been documented to interact with alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, and/or oxycodone include: erythromycin and fluconazole.(37)
Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
Agents With Hyponatremia Risk/Desmopressin
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Carbamazepine, chlorpromazine, lamotrigine, NSAIDs, opioids, SSRIs, thiazide diuretics, and/or tricyclic antidepressants increase the risk of hyponatremia.(1-3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use may increase the risk of hyponatremia with desmopressin.(1-3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Predisposing factors for hyponatremia include: polydipsia, renal impairment (eGFR < 50 ml/min/1.73m2), illnesses that can cause fluid/electrolyte imbalances, age >=65, medications that cause water retention and/or increase the risk of hyponatremia (glucocorticoids, loop diuretics).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The concurrent use of agents with a risk of hyponatremia with desmopressin may increase the risk of hyponatremia. If concurrent use is deemed medically necessary, make sure serum sodium levels are normal before beginning therapy and consider using the desmopressin nasal 0.83 mcg dose. Consider measuring serum sodium levels more frequently than the recommended intervals of: within 7 days of concurrent therapy initiation, one month after concurrent therapy initiation and periodically during treatment. Counsel patients to report symptoms of hyponatremia, which may include: headache, nausea/vomiting, feeling restless, fatigue, drowsiness, dizziness, muscle cramps, changes in mental state (confusion, decreased awareness/alertness), seizures, coma, and trouble breathing. Counsel patients to limit the amount of fluids they drink in the evening and night-time and to stop taking desmopressin if they develop a stomach/intestinal virus with nausea/vomiting or any nose problems (blockage, stuffy/runny nose, drainage).(1)
DISCUSSION: In clinical trials of desmopressin for the treatment of nocturia, 4 of 5 patients who developed severe hyponatremia (serum sodium <= 125 mmol/L) were taking systemic or inhaled glucocorticoids. Three of these patients were also taking NSAIDs and one was receiving a thiazide diuretic.(2) Drugs associated with hyponatremia may increase the risk, including loop diuretics, carbamazepine, chlorpromazine, glucocorticoids, lamotrigine, NSAIDs, opioids, SSRIs, thiazide diuretics, and/or tricyclic antidepressants.(1,3-4)
Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets/Fruquintinib; Surufatinib
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bleeding has been reported with the use of fruquintinib and surufatinib.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of fruquintinib or surufatinib with either anticoagulants or antiplatelets may increase the risk of hemorrhage.(1,2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy with fruquintinib and anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets should be closely monitored for changes in platelet count or in International Normalized Ratio (INR). If a serious bleeding event occurs, the manufacturer recommends permanent discontinuation of fruquintinib.(1) Patients receiving concurrent therapy with surufatinib and anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets should be closely monitored for changes in platelet count or in INR.If a serious bleeding event occurs, the manufacturer recommends permanent discontinuation of surufatinib.(2) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: Bleeding has been reported with fruquintinib in three randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trials. The incidence of grade 1 and grade 2 bleeding events was 28.2%, including gastrointestinal bleeding (10.9%), hematuria (10.6%), and epistaxis (7.5%). The incidence of grade 3 or higher bleeding events was 2.1% and included gastrointestinal bleeding (1.6%) and hemoptysis (0.5%).(1) Bleeding has been reported with surufatinib in clinical trials. Grade 1 and 2 bleeding events included gastrointestinal bleeding, blood in the urine, and gum bleeding. The incidence of grade 3 or greater bleeding events was 4.5%, including gastrointestinal hemorrhage (1.9%), and cerebral hemorrhage (1.1%). Fatalities due to bleeding were reported in 0.3% of patients. The incidence of permanent discontinuation due to bleeding was 2.6% and the incidence of suspension of surufatinib due to bleeding was 3.8%.(2)
Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets/Obinutuzumab
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Severe and life-threatening thrombocytopenia has been reported during obinutuzumab therapy.(1) Anticoagulants and antiplatelets may have an additive risk of bleeding.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of obinutuzumab with anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents may result in additive or synergistic effects, including fatal and non-fatal hemorrhage.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor all patients frequently for thrombocytopenia and signs of bleeding. Consider withholding concomitant anticoagulants and antiplatelets, especially during the first cycle of obinutuzumab.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Obinutuzumab with chemotherapy has been reported to cause severe and life-threatening thrombocytopenia. Fatal hemorrhagic events have occurred in patients with NHL and CLL during obinutuzumab therapy, including during Cycle 1.(1)
Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets/Plasminogen
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bleeding has been reported with the use of plasminogen.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of plasminogen with either anticoagulants or antiplatelets may increase the risk of active bleeding during plasminogen therapy, including bleeding from mucosal disease-related lesions that may manifest as gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding, hemoptysis, epistaxis, vaginal bleeding, or hematuria.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy with plasminogen and anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets should be closely monitored during plasminogen therapy for active bleeding from mucosal disease-related lesions, including GI bleeding, hemoptysis, epistaxis, vaginal bleeding, or hematuria.(1) Prior to initiation of treatment with plasminogen, confirm healing of lesions or wounds suspected as a source of a recent bleeding event. Monitor patients during and for 4 hours after infusion when administering plasminogen with concurrent anticoagulants, antiplatelet drugs, or other agents which may interfere with normal coagulation.(1) If patient experiences uncontrolled bleeding (defined as any gastrointestinal bleeding or bleeding from any other site that persists longer than 30 minutes), seek emergency care and discontinue plasminogen immediately.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: Plasminogen has not been studied in patients at an increased risk of bleeding. Bleeding has been reported with plasminogen in a two single-arm, open-label clinical trials as well as in compassionate use programs. The incidence of hemorrhage in patients with Plasminogen Deficiency Type 1 was 16% (3/19 patients).(1) One of the bleeding events occurred two days after receiving the second dose of plasminogen in a patient with a recent history of GI bleeding due to gastric ulcers. The patient received plasminogen through a compassionate use program and the dose was 6.6 mg/kg body weight every 2 days. Endoscopy showed multiple ulcers with one actively bleeding ulcer near the pylorus.(1)
Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets/Tisotumab
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Bleeding, including hemorrhage, has been reported with the use of tisotumab.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of tisotumab with either anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or NSAIDs may increase the risk of hemorrhage.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy with tisotumab and anticoagulants, antiplatelets, and/or NSAIDs should be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of bleeding and changes in platelet count or International Normalized Ratio (INR). For patients experiencing pulmonary or central nervous system (CNS) hemorrhage, permanently discontinue tisotumab. For grade 2 or greater hemorrhage in any other location, withhold until bleeding has resolved, blood hemoglobin is stable, there is no bleeding diathesis that could increase the risk of continuing therapy, and there is no anatomical or pathologic condition that can increase the risk of hemorrhage. After resolution, either resume treatment or permanently discontinue tisotumab.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: Hemorrhage occurred in 62% of patients with cervical cancer treated with tisotumab across clinical trials. The most common all grade hemorrhage adverse reactions were epistaxis (44%), hematuria (10%), and vaginal hemorrhage (10%). Grade 3 hemorrhage occurred in 5% of patients.(1)
Ibuprofen; Indomethacin/Digoxin
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism of this interaction is unknown, but it may involve decreased digoxin renal excretion.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Increased levels of digoxin which may result in digoxin toxicity. Symptoms of digoxin toxicity can include anorexia, nausea, vomiting, headache, fatigue, malaise, drowsiness, generalized muscle weakness, hallucinations, visual disturbances, and arrhythmias.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Low body weight, advanced age, impaired renal function, hypokalemia, hypercalcemia, and/or hypomagnesemia may increase the risk of digoxin toxicity.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Digoxin levels should be monitored and patients should be monitored for signs of digoxin toxicity during concurrent therapy. The dosage of digoxin may need to be decreased by 15-30% or the frequency of administration may be reduced.
DISCUSSION: Although the documentation for this interaction is conflicting, caution is warranted. One study in 12 patients reported that serum digoxin levels were significantly increased (mean 59%) after concurrent administration of ibuprofen (1600 to 1800 mg/day) for seven days. However, there was no significant difference in digoxin levels after 28 days of concomitant therapy. In another study in eight patients, there was no significant change in digoxin serum concentration during concurrent administration of ibuprofen. Indomethacin-induced digoxin toxicity in three premature infants has been reported in one study. In another study, administration of indomethacin to 11 preterm infants who received intravenous digoxin followed by oral maintenance doses of digoxin resulted in a significant increase of digoxin serum concentration by 40.6% with a significant decrease in urine output by 47.7%. The digoxin half-life increased 125.5%. This study recommended decreasing the digoxin dosage by 50% when indomethacin is added to digoxin therapy in preterm infants until further assessments of urine output and digoxin levels are obtained. There are two case reports of digoxin toxicity in neonates following the addition of indomethacin to therapy. Administration of indomethacin to ten patients maintained on digoxin resulted in a 39.7% increase in digoxin concentrations. In contrast, the concurrent administration of indomethacin and digoxin in six healthy adults did not result in a significant pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic interaction. However, indomethacin did tend to elevate serum digoxin levels, strengthen the digoxin-induced decrease in ECG parameters and heart rate, and reduce the positive inotropic action of digoxin. In another study involving six healthy adults, the administration of indomethacin for three days followed by a single infusion of digoxin (750 mcg) did not affect any pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic parameters of digoxin.
Nsaids/Corticosteroids
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids result in additive risk of GI ulceration.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids may increase the incidence and/or severity of GI irritation or ulceration, including increasing the risk for bleeding.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased by concurrent use of anticoagulants, antiplatelets, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs); with longer duration of NSAID use; and with prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding. The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy carefully for signs of gastrointestinal ulceration. Use the lowest effective NSAID dose for the shortest duration possible. If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Instruct patients to report signs of GI bleeding such as black, tarry stools; "coffee ground" vomit; nausea; or stomach/abdominal pain.
DISCUSSION: Concurrent use of NSAIDs and corticosteroids increase the risk of GI bleeding.
Nsaids/Erlotinib
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of NSAIDs may increase the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding and/or perforation in patients receiving erlotinib. Fatalities have been reported.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients with a history of peptic ulceration or diverticular disease or who are receiving concomitant anti-angiogenic, corticosteroids, and/or taxane-based chemotherapy may be an increased risk of gastrointestinal perforation.(1) The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of gastrointestinal bleeding and/or perforation. Discontinue erlotinib in patients who develop gastrointestinal perforation.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Infrequent cases of gastrointestinal bleeding were reported during erlotinib trials. Some cases were associated with NSAID administration.(1) In a phase II trial of concurrent bevacizumab plus erlotinib, 2 of 13 patients suffered fatal gastrointestinal perforations.(2) In another phase II trial of concurrent bevacizumab with erlotinib, 1 of 104 patients died of gastrointestinal perforation.(3)
Nsaids/Heparins
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Heparin inhibits thrombosis by inactivating activated Factor X and inhibiting the conversion of prothrombin to thrombin.(1) NSAIDs inhibit coagulation by interfering with platelet-aggregation, while inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis increases the risk for gastrointestinal bleeding.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of heparin and an NSAID may increase the risk for bleeding.(1,2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., other anticoagulants, antiplatelets, corticosteroids, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs). Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Manufacturers recommend caution and monitoring when using this combination of drugs.(1,2) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: Based upon drug mechanisms of action, careful monitoring would be prudent.
Nsaids; Aspirin (Non-Cardioprotective)/Beta-Blockers
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Unknown; however, possibly related to inhibition of prostaglandin by NSAIDs.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The antihypertensive action of beta-blockers may be decreased.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patient's blood pressure and adjust the dose of the beta-blocker as needed.
DISCUSSION: Concurrent administration of beta-blockers and NSAIDs has been associated with a clinically significant loss in antihypertensive response. The magnitude of the effect of NSAIDs on control of blood pressure by beta-blockers needs to be determined for each anti-inflammatory agent. One or more of the drug pairs linked to this monograph have been included in a list of interactions that could be considered for classification as "non-interruptive" in EHR systems. This DDI subset was vetted by an expert panel commissioned by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology.
Nsaids; Aspirin (Non-Cardioprotective)/Metoprolol
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Unknown; however, possibly related to inhibition of prostaglandin by NSAIDs.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The antihypertensive action of metoprolol may be decreased.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patient's blood pressure and adjust the dose of metoprolol as needed.
DISCUSSION: Concurrent administration of metoprolol and NSAIDs has been associated with a clinically significant loss in antihypertensive response. The magnitude of the effect of NSAIDs on control of blood pressure by beta-blockers needs to be determined for each anti-inflammatory agent. One or more of the drug pairs linked to this monograph have been included in a list of interactions that could be considered for classification as "non-interruptive" in EHR systems. This DDI subset was vetted by an expert panel commissioned by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Aldosterone Receptor Antag; Baxdrostat
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown; however, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) inhibition of prostaglandins may allow baxdrostat, eplerenone, finerenone, or spironolactone-induced nephrotoxicity or hyperkalemia to occur in some patients.(1-4) In some patients, NSAIDs may reduce the diuretic, natriuretic and antihypertensive effects of baxdrostat, eplerenone, finerenone, or spironolactone.(1-4)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of baxdrostat, eplerenone, finerenone, or spironolactone with NSAIDs may result in renal failure or hyperkalemia. The effects of the diuretic, natriuretic, or antihypertensive effects of baxdrostat, eplerenone, finerenone, or spironolactone may be decreased.(1-4)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: When possible, avoid concurrent therapy with baxdrostat, eplerenone, finerenone, or spironolactone with NSAIDs. If these agents are used concurrently, monitor renal function and serum electrolytes. If decreased renal function or hyperkalemia develops, discontinue both agents. The manufacturer of eplerenone recommends checking serum potassium and serum creatinine within 3-7 days of concurrent therapy with NSAIDs.(1) The manufacturer of spironolactone states concurrent use with NSAIDs may lead to severe hyperkalemia and extreme caution should be used during concurrent therapy.(2)
DISCUSSION: Although acute renal failure and hyperkalemia have only been reported in studies and case reports involving indomethacin, diclofenac, flurbiprofen, and ibuprofen with either triamterene or amiloride, the proposed mechanism suggests that all nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents may be capable of this interaction with all potassium-sparing diuretics. Patients receiving diuretics are at an increased risk of NSAID-induced renal failure.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Aliskiren
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown. It is believed to be related to inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis by the NSAIDs. Use of an NSAID in combination with aliskiren, whose hypotensive effects may be related to the increase in hypotensive prostaglandins, may negate any decrease in blood pressure.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of aliskiren with NSAIDs may result in decreased antihypertensive effects. In patients with existing renal impairment, the use of these agents together may also result in further deterioration of renal clearance caused by renal hypoperfusion.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients maintained on aliskiren should be monitored for a loss of blood pressure control and a change in renal function if an NSAID is added to their regimen. Patients receiving concurrent therapy may require higher doses of aliskiren. If blood pressure control cannot be achieved or if the patient's renal function deteriorates, the NSAID may need to be discontinued. Patients should be monitored for hypotension if NSAIDs are withdrawn from concurrent aliskiren therapy.
DISCUSSION: Indomethacin has been shown to inhibit the antihypertensive effect of captopril, cilazapril, enalapril, losartan, perindopril, and valsartan. Ibuprofen has been shown to decrease the antihypertensive effects of captopril. Two separate case reports describe individuals suspected of ACEI-associated angioedema precipitated by NSAIDs. Both cases reported symptom resolution after cessation of the NSAID. Studies have shown that sulindac does not affect the antihypertensive effects of captopril and enalapril.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Angiotensin Ii Receptor Blocker (Arb)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) can cause vasodilation of the efferent renal arteriole which may result in decreased glomerular filtration rate. NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis which can lead to afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and may negate any decrease in blood pressure.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of ARBs with NSAIDs may result in decreased antihypertensive effects. In patients with existing renal impairment, the use of these agents together may also result in further deterioration of renal clearance caused by renal hypoperfusion. Concurrent use of ARBs with NSAIDs and diuretics may result in increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Low water intake/dehydration, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and use of diuretics can lead to hypovolemia and increased risk of AKI.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients maintained on ARBs should be monitored for a loss of blood pressure control and a change in renal function if an NSAID is added to their regimen. Patients receiving concurrent therapy may require higher doses of ARBs. If blood pressure control cannot be achieved or if the patient's renal function deteriorates, the NSAID may need to be discontinued. Patients should be monitored for hypotension if NSAIDs are withdrawn from concurrent ARB therapy. Concurrent use of ARBs with NSAIDs and diuretics should be used with caution and monitored for signs of AKI.
DISCUSSION: In a computational study, the risk of AKI using triple therapy (combination of a diuretic, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor, and NSAID) was assessed. The study found the following factors may increase an individual's susceptibility to AKI: low water intake, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment.(22,23) In an observational study, current use of a triple therapy combination was associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury (rate ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.53). The highest risk of AKI associated with triple therapy were observed in the first 30 days of use (RR 1.82, CI 1.35-2.46).(24) In a population based cohort study, the concurrent use of NSAIDs with renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in 5,710 hypertensive patients stabilized on antihypertensive therapy required hypertension treatment intensification. Adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for hypertension treatment intensification were 1.34 [95% CI 1.05-1.71] for NSAIDs in general, 1.79 (95% CI 1.15-2.78) for diclofenac and 2.02 (95% CI 1.09-3.77) for piroxicam. There were significant interactions between NSAIDs and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE inhibitors; HR 4.09, 95% CI 2.02-8.27) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs; HR 3.62, 95% CI 1.80-7.31), but not with other antihypertensive drugs.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Drospirenone
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Drospirenone has antimineralocorticoid activity and may cause hyperkalemia. NSAIDs may also increase potassium levels.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of drospirenone and NSAIDs may result in hyperkalemia.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Renal insufficiency, hepatic dysfunction, adrenal insufficiency, and use of potassium supplements, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor antagonists, heparin, and potassium-sparing diuretics may increase potassium levels.(1)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving drospirenone with a NSAID should have their serum potassium level checked during the first treatment cycle.(1)
DISCUSSION: Drospirenone has antimineralocorticoid activity comparable to 25 mg of spironolactone and may result in hyperkalemia. Concurrent use of NSAIDs may also increase potassium levels.(1) Occasional or chronic use of NSAIDs was not restricted in clinical trials of drospirenone.(1)
Nsaids; Salicylates/Lithium
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Decreased renal excretion of lithium, possibly resulting from NSAID-induced prostaglandin inhibition.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: May observe increased lithium toxicity.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Risk factors for lithium toxicity include: renal impairment or worsening of existing renal disease, dehydration, low sodium diet, and concomitant use of multiple medications which may impair renal elimination of lithium (e.g. ARBs, ACE Inhibitors, NSAIDs, diuretics). Patients who require higher therapeutic lithium levels to maintain symptom control are particularly susceptible to these factors.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The magnitude of this interaction is highly variable. Patients with predisposing factors, e.g. dehydration, renal impairment, or concurrent use of other agents which may impair lithium elimination, are expected to have a higher risk for lithium toxicity. If both drugs are administered, monitor plasma lithium levels and observe the patient for signs and symptoms of lithium toxicity or changes in renal function. Full effects of the addition or an increase in NSAID dose may not be seen for one to two weeks. Adjust the dose of lithium accordingly. If lithium is to be started in a patient stabilized on chronic NSAID therapy, consider starting with a lower lithium dose and titrate slowly as half-life may be prolonged. Monitor lithium concentrations until stabilized on the combination. Counsel the patient to contact their prescriber before starting an OTC NSAID. Assure that patients are familiar with signs and symptoms of lithium toxicity (e.g. new or worsening tremor, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, ataxia, or altered mental status) and to report signs and symptoms of toxicity.
DISCUSSION: Numerous studies and case reports have been documented that administration of a NSAID to a patient stabilized on lithium therapy may result in increased serum lithium levels and possible toxicity. Full effects may take 1 to 2 weeks to develop and may persist for a week after the NSAID is discontinued.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Loop Diuretics
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: During concurrent administration of a loop diuretic and a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), patients may retain sodium as a result of NSAID-induced prostaglandin inhibition.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The pharmacological effects of loop diuretics may be decreased due to reduced antihypertensive and diuretic actions. Concurrent use of NSAIDs with loop diuretics and renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may result in increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Low water intake/dehydration, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment may increase an individuals susceptibility to AKI.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients for a decrease in the effects of the loop diuretic. It may be necessary to administer a higher dose of the diuretic or an alternative anti-inflammatory agent. Concurrent use of NSAIDs with loop diuretics and RAS inhibitors should be used with caution and monitored closely for signs of AKI.
DISCUSSION: In a computational study, the risk of AKI using triple therapy with a diuretic, RAS inhibitor, and NSAID was assessed. The study found the following factors may increase an individual's susceptibility to AKI: low water intake, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment.(19,20) In an observational study, current use of a triple therapy with a diuretic, RAS inhibitor, and NSAID, was associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury (rate ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.53). The highest risk of AKI associated with triple therapy were observed in the first 30 days of use (RR 1.82, CI 1.35-2.46). (21) Administration of indomethacin alone has been reported to decrease sodium excretion and increase blood pressure. In patients receiving a loop diuretic (e.g., bumetanide, furosemide), these effects interfere with clinical management. Several NSAIDs have been shown to interact with loop diuretics interfering with the pharmacological effects of the diuretic. In volunteers on sodium restricted diets, ibuprofen and indomethacin inhibited furosemide diuresis.
Nsaids; Salicylates/Minoxidil
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Oral minoxidil functions as a direct-acting peripheral vasodilator, lowering elevated systolic and diastolic blood pressure by reducing resistance in peripheral blood vessels. This triggers a compensatory increase in cardiac output and renin secretion and results in sodium and water retention. NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis and also result in sodium and water retention.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The risk of heart failure may increase with oral minoxidil and NSAIDs due to their combined effects on blood vessel dilation, fluid retention, and altered sodium balance. Minoxidil efficacy may be compromised.(1,2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Higher doses of oral minoxidil have been associated with serious adverse events, including hypotensive syncope, pericarditis, pericardial effusion, and myocardial infarction.(1-5)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Closely monitor body weight, fluid and electrolyte balance, and blood pressure when using oral minoxidil and NSAIDs concurrently. Minoxidil tablets should be co-administered with an appropriate diuretic to prevent fluid retention and potential congestive heart failure. A high-ceiling (loop) diuretic is often necessary alongside vigilant monitoring of body weight. Without concurrent diuretic use, minoxidil may lead to the retention of salt and water within a few days.(1,2)
DISCUSSION: While the manufacturer of minoxidil does not provide specific recommendations regarding NSAID co-administration, it emphasizes the necessity of combining minoxidil with a beta-blocker to prevent tachycardia and increased myocardial workload. Additionally, concurrent use with a diuretic is recommended to avert serious fluid accumulation and potential congestive heart failure. NSAID labeling warns about fluid retention, edema, an elevated risk of heart failure, and potential drug interactions with beta-blockers and diuretics which can result in a blunting of the antihypertensive and cardiovascular effects of these agents.(1-5)
Nsaids; Salicylates/Sparsentan
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Sparsentan is an endothelin and angiotensin II receptor antagonist.(1) Angiotensin II receptor blockers can cause vasodilation of the efferent renal arteriole which may result in decreased glomerular filtration rate. NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis which can lead to afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of sparsentan with NSAIDs (including selective COX-2 inhibitors) may result in renal hypoperfusion and deterioration of renal clearance, including possible acute kidney injury (AKI). These effects are usually reversible.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients older than 75 years old, with renal artery stenosis, chronic kidney disease, severe congestive heart failure, or volume depletion (including from diuretic use and dehydration) may be at greater risk for AKI.(1-3)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor for signs of worsening renal function if an NSAID (including selective COX-2 inhibitors) is used concurrently with sparsentan. If renal function deteriorates, the NSAID may need to be discontinued.(1)
DISCUSSION: In a computational study, the risk of AKI using triple therapy with a diuretic, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor, and NSAID was assessed. The study found the following factors may increase an individual's susceptibility to AKI: low water intake, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment.(2,3) In an observational study, current use of a triple therapy combination was associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury (rate ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.53). The highest risk of AKI associated with triple therapy were observed in the first 30 days of use (RR 1.82, CI 1.35-2.46).(4)
Nsaids; Salicylates/T Cell Immunotherapies
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: NSAIDs augment the immune system. Concurrent use with NSAIDs may interfere with the activity of CAR-T cell immunotherapies.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: NSAIDs may decrease the efficacy of CAR-T cell immunotherapies.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: NSAIDs should be used with caution with or after CAR-T cell immunotherapy.(1)
DISCUSSION: An in vitro study showed aspirin and celecoxib negatively affected CD19.CAR-T cells through their effects on the induction of apoptosis, reduction of activation, and impairment of proliferation.(1)
Opioids (Immediate Release)/Benzodiazepines
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and benzodiazepines may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as benzodiazepines, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as benzodiazepines to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(4) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(5) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(6) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(7) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(8) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(9) A study of 315,428 privately insured patients who filled at least one prescription for an opioid from 2001 to 2013 were enrolled in a retrospective study. Concurrent use of a benzodiazepine was recorded as having at least one day of overlap in a given calendar year. Baseline characteristics among opioid users with concurrent use of a benzodiazepine were older (44.5 v. 42.4, p<0.001), less likely to be men (35% v. 43%, p<0.001), and had a higher prevalence rate of every comorbidity examined (p<0.001). The proportion of opioid users with concurrent benzodiazepine use nearly doubled from 9% in 2001 to 17% in 2013. The primary outcome was an emergency room visit or inpatient admission for opioid overdose within a calendar year. Among all opioid users, the annual adjusted incidence for the primary outcome was 1.16% without concurrent benzodiazepine use compared to 2.42% with concurrent benzodiazepine use (OR 2.14; 95% CI 2.05-2.24; p<0.001). Intermittent opioid users (1.45% v. 1.02%; OR 1.42; 95% CI 1.33-1.51; p<0.001) and chronic opioid users (5.36% v. 3.13%; OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.67-1.96; p<0.001) also experienced a higher adjusted incidence of the primary outcome with concurrent benzodiazepine use compared to without concurrent benzodiazepine use, respectively.(10) In a nested case-control study of adults with a new opioid dispensing between 2010-2018, patients with concurrent use of an opioid with a benzodiazepine were significantly more likely to have opioid-related overdose compared to patients receiving opioids, benzodiazepines, or neither (OR 9.28; 95% CI 7.87, 10.93). Longer concurrent use of 1-7, 8-30, and 31-90 days was associated with 4.6, 12.1, and 26.7-fold higher likelihood of opioid-related overdose (p<0.01). Patients with overlapping prescriptions during previous 0-30, 31-60, and 61-90 days were 13.2, 6.0, and 3.2-times more likely to experience an overdose (p<0.01).(11)
Opioids (Immediate Release)/Cyclobenzaprine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and cyclobenzaprine may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as cyclobenzaprine, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as muscle relaxants to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(4) A retrospective cohort study compared the risk of opioid overdose associated with concomitant use of opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants versus opioid use alone. The study examined two types of opioid users (naive opioid use and prevalent opioid use) with and without exposure to skeletal muscle relaxants. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were 1.09 and 1.26 in the naive and prevalent opioid user cohorts, respectively, generating a combined estimate of 1.21. The risk increased with treatment duration (less than or equal to 14 days: 0.91; 15-60 days: 1.37; and greater than 60 days: 1.80) and for the use of baclofen and carisoprodol (HR 1.83 and 1.84, respectively). Elevated risk was associated with concomitant users with daily opioid dose greater than 50 mg and benzodiazepine use (HR 1.50 and 1.39, respectively).(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10)
Opioids (Immediate Release)/Muscle Relaxants
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and muscle relaxants may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as muscle relaxants, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as muscle relaxants to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(4) A retrospective cohort study compared the risk of opioid overdose associated with concomitant use of opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants versus opioid use alone. The study examined two types of opioid users (naive opioid use and prevalent opioid use) with and without exposure to skeletal muscle relaxants. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were 1.09 and 1.26 in the naive and prevalent opioid user cohorts, respectively, generating a combined estimate of 1.21. The risk increased with treatment duration (less than or equal to 14 days: 0.91; 15-60 days: 1.37; and greater than 60 days: 1.80) and for the use of baclofen and carisoprodol (HR 1.83 and 1.84, respectively). Elevated risk was associated with concomitant users with daily opioid dose greater than 50 mg and benzodiazepine use (HR 1.50 and 1.39, respectively).(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10)
Opioids (Immediate Release)/Selected Stimulants
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Opioids and stimulants exhibit opposing effects on the CNS.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Opposing CNS effects of opioids and stimulants may compromise the effectiveness of both agents and mask opioid overdose symptoms such as drowsiness and inability to focus.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS stimulants such as amphetamines to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain. If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(1) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of substance abuse. Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness. Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).
DISCUSSION: A total of 70,237 persons died from drug overdoses in the United States in 2017; approximately two thirds of these deaths involved an opioid.(2). The CDC analyzed 2016-2017 changes in age-adjusted death rates involving cocaine and psychostimulants by demographic characteristics, urbanization levels, U.S. Census region, 34 states, and the District of Columbia (DC). The CDC also examined trends in age-adjusted cocaine-involved and psychostimulant-involved death rates from 2003 to 2017 overall, as well as with and without co-involvement of opioids. Among all 2017 drug overdose deaths, 13,942 (19.8%) involved cocaine, and 10,333 (14.7%) involved psychostimulants. Death rates increased from 2016 to 2017 for both drug categories across demographic characteristics, urbanization levels, Census regions, and states. In 2017, opioids were involved in 72.7% and 50.4% of cocaine-involved and psychostimulant-involved overdoses, respectively, and the data suggest that increases in cocaine-involved overdose deaths from 2012 to 2017 were driven primarily by synthetic opioids.(3) There was opioid co-involvement in 72.7 percent of cocaine and 50.4 percent of stimulant-involved overdose deaths. This was largely driven by synthetic opioids such as fentanyl. However, stimulant-involved overdose without opioid co-involvement is also increasing.(2)
Opioids (Immediate Release)/Sleep Drugs
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and sleep drugs may result in additive CNS depression and sleep-related disorders.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as sleep drugs, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1) Concurrent use of opioids with eszopiclone, zaleplon, or zolpidem may increase the risk of sleep-related disorders including central sleep apnea and sleep-related hypoxemia and complex sleep behaviors like sleepwalking, sleep driving, and other activities while not fully awake. Rarely, serious injuries or death have resulted from complex sleep behaviors.(2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as sleep drugs to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(3) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Eszopiclone, zaleplon, and zolpidem are contraindicated in patients who have had a previous episode of complex sleep behavior.(2) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(4)
DISCUSSION: Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10) As of April 2019, the FDA had identified 66 cases of complex sleep behaviors with eszopiclone, zaleplon, or zolpidem, of which 20 cases resulted in death and the remainder resulted in serious injuries. It was not reported how many of the cases involved concomitant use of other CNS depressants.(2)
Opioids (Ir & Er)/Gabapentinoids
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Opioid-induced reduction in GI motility may increase the absorption of gabapentin and pregabalin.(1) Gabapentin and pregabalin may reverse opioid-induced tolerance of respiratory depression.(2) Concurrent use may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(3)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids may result in elevated levels of and toxicity from gabapentin and pregabalin, including profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1-7)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients who are elderly, are taking other CNS depressants, have decreased renal function, and/or have conditions that reduce lung function (e.g. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD]) may be at a higher risk of this interaction.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics and gabapentinoids to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a gabapentinoid with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the gabapentinoid than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a gabapentinoid, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(8) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(9)
DISCUSSION: In a study in 12 healthy males, administration of a single dose of morphine (60 mg sustained release) increased the area-under-curve (AUC) of a single dose of gabapentin (600 mg) by 44%.(1,3,4) There were no affects on the pharmacokinetics of morphine.(1,3,4) The combination of gabapentin plus morphine increased pain tolerance over the combination of morphine plus placebo. Side effects were not significantly different between morphine plus placebo and morphine plus gabapentin.(1) A retrospective, case-control study of opioid users in Ontario, Canada between August 1, 1997 and December 31, 2013 who died of an opioid-related cause matched cases to up to 4 controls who also used opioids. Use of gabapentin in the 120 days prior to death resulted in a significant increase in odds of opioid-related death (OR 1.99, CI=1.61-2.47, p<0.001), compared to opioid use alone. Use of moderate dose (900 mg to 1,799 mg daily) or high dose (>= 1,800 mg daily) gabapentin increased the odds of opioid-related death 60% compared to opioid use without gabapentin. Review of gabapentin prescriptions from calendar year 2013 found that 46% of gabapentin users received at least 1 opioid prescription.(3) Among 49 case reports submitted to FDA over a 5 year period (2012-2017), 12 people died from respiratory depression with gabapentinoids. Two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in healthy people, three observational studies, and several studies in animals were reviewed. A trial showed that using pregabalin alone and using it with an opioid pain reliever can depress breathing function. Three observational studies showed a relationship between gabapentinoids given before surgery and respiratory depression occurring after surgery. Several animal studies also showed that pregabalin plus opioids can depress respiratory function.(7) A retrospective cohort study evaluated the risk of mortality among Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 and older who were taking gabapentin with or without concurrent use of opioids. All-cause mortality in gabapentin users compared to duloxetine users was 12.16 per 1,000 person years vs. 9.94 per 1,000 person years, respectively. Adjusted for covariates, the risk of all-cause mortality among gabapentin users on high-dose opioids was more than double the control group (hazard ratio (HR) 2.03, CI=1.19-3.46).(10)
Opioids/Buprenorphine; Pentazocine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Buprenorphine is a partial agonist at mu-opiate receptors, exhibiting a ceiling effect at which higher doses produce no further effect. Pentazocine is a mixed agonist-antagonist at opiate receptors.(1) Full mu-opioid agonists (e.g., morphine, methadone) continue to have increased effects at higher doses without ceiling effects.(2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of buprenorphine or pentazocine with other opioids in opioid dependent patients may result in withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent use in other patients may result in additive or decreased analgesia and decreased opioid side effects.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients dependent on opioids or who take higher dosages of opioids may be more likely to experience withdrawal symptoms with concurrent use.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Use buprenorphine and pentazocine with caution in patients maintained or dependent on other opioids and monitor for signs of withdrawal. In other patients, also monitor for changes in analgesic effects. The manufacturer of Sublocade states buprenorphine may precipitate opioid withdrawal in patients who are currently physically dependent on full opioid agonists. The risk of withdrawal may be increased if buprenorphine is given less than 6 hours after short-acting opioids (such as heroin, morphine) and less than 24 hours after long-acting opioids (such as methadone).(3)
DISCUSSION: Concurrent use of buprenorphine with other opioids in opioid dependent patients could result in withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent use in other patients may result in additive or decreased analgesia, decreased opioid side effects, and/or renarcotization.(2) In clinical trials, administration of buprenorphine injection produced withdrawal symptoms in patients maintained on methadone (30 mg daily) when administered 2 hours post-methadone,(4) but not when administered 20 hours post-methadone.(5) In another study, sublingual buprenorphine produced withdrawal symptoms in patients maintained on methadone. Symptoms were more pronounced in patients maintained on 60 mg daily doses than in patients maintained on 30 mg daily doses.(6) In a study of 10 patients maintained on methadone (100 mg daily), only three were able to tolerate escalating sublingual doses of buprenorphine/naloxone up to 32/8 mg. Split doses produced less withdrawal symptoms than full doses.(7) In a case report, a heroin-user maintained in a buprenorphine-maintenance program began stockpiling his buprenorphine instead of ingesting it and began using heroin. He then decided to re-initiate treatment on his own and ingested between 80 and 88 mg of buprenorphine over a two day period and experienced extreme withdrawal symptoms, despite restarting heroin during these symptoms. Methadone relieved his withdrawal symptoms.(8)
Opioids/Butorphanol
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Butorphanol antagonize mu-opiate receptors. Other opioids agonize mu-opiate receptors.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of butorphanol with other opioids in opioid dependent patients may result in withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent use in other patients may result in additive or decreased analgesia and decreased opioid side effects.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients dependent on opioids may be more likely to experience withdrawal symptoms with concurrent use. Patients using higher doses of opioids may also be at a higher risk.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Use butorphanol with caution in patients maintained or dependent on other opioids and monitor for signs of withdrawal. In other patients, also monitor for changes in analgesic effects.
DISCUSSION: Because butorphanol antagonizes mu-opiate receptors and other opioids agonize mu-opiate receptors, concurrent use of buprenorphine with other opioids in opioid dependent patients may result in withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent use in other patients may result in additive or decreased analgesia and decreased opioid side effects.(1) In a study in patients maintained on methadone, butorphanol produced withdrawal symptoms comparable to naloxone.(2) In a case report, the use of remifentanil for conscious sedation in a patient maintained on butorphanol produced severe withdrawal symptoms.(3)
Opioids/Nalbuphine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Nalbuphine(1) antagonizes mu-opiate receptors. Other opioids agonize mu-opiate receptors.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of nalbuphine with other opioids in opioid dependent patients may result in withdrawal symptoms. Concurrent use in other patients may result in additive or decreased analgesia, decreased opioid side effects, and/or renarcotization.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients dependent on opioids may be more likely to experience withdrawal symptoms with concurrent use. In opioid naive patients, higher doses of nalbuphine may result in decreased analgesic effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Use nalbuphine with caution in patients maintained or dependent on other opioids and monitor for signs of withdrawal. In other patients, also monitor for changes in analgesic effects. If nalbuphine is used to reverse opioid anesthesia, monitor patients for renarcotization.
DISCUSSION: Nalbuphine has been successfully used as an adjunct to morphine without decreasing analgesic effects.(2,3) However, other studies reported increased morphine requirements in patients who had initially received nalbuphine.(4,5) Nalbuphine has been used to reverse fentanyl anesthesia;(8-13) however, patients often required additional pain medication(5-7) and some studies reported renarcotization after the effects of nalbuphine wore off.(9,10) Nalbuphine has also been used to prevent epidural fentanyl,(13) morphine(14-16), and hydromorphone induced pruritus;(17-18) however, one study reported shortening of the duration of analgesia(16) and another reported increased PCA demands.(17) In methadone-dependent subjects, administration of nalbuphine produced withdrawal symptoms similar to naloxone.(19,20) Administration of nalbuphine to patients maintained on controlled-release morphine resulted in withdrawal symptoms.(20,21)
Selected Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets/Ibrutinib
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Ibrutinib administration lowers platelet count in the majority of patients.(1,2) In addition, ibrutinib has been shown to inhibit collagen-mediated platelet aggregation.(3-4) Bleeding has been reported with the use of ibrutinib,(1-4) anticoagulants, or antiplatelets alone.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of ibrutinib with either anticoagulants or antiplatelets may increase the risk of hemorrhage.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The Canadian product monograph for ibrutinib recommends concurrent use with anticoagulants or antiplatelets should be approached with caution. If therapeutic anticoagulation is required, consider temporarily withholding ibrutinib therapy until stable anticoagulation in achieved.(2) The US prescribing information for ibrutinib states patients receiving concurrent therapy with ibrutinib and anticoagulants and/or antiplatelets should be closely monitored for changes in platelet count or in International Normalized Ratio (INR). Carefully weigh the risks vs. benefits of concurrent therapy in patients with significant thrombocytopenia. If a bleeding event occurs, follow manufacturer instructions for ibrutinib dose adjustment.(1) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory tests (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling. The time of highest risk for a coumarin-type drug interaction is when the precipitant drug is initiated or discontinued. Contact the prescriber before initiating, altering the dose or discontinuing either drug.
DISCUSSION: Bleeding has been reported with ibrutinib alone.(1-3) Across 27 clinical trials, grade 3 or higher bleeding events, e.g. subdural hematoma, gastrointestinal bleeding or hematuria, have occurred in up to 4% of patients, with 0.4% fatality. Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 5-19% of patients. Bleeding events of any grade occurred in 39% of patients treated with ibrutinib.(1) Concurrent use of anticoagulants or antiplatelets has been reported to increase the risk for major bleeding. In clinical trials, major bleeding occurred in 3.1% of patients taking ibrutinib without concurrent anticoagulants or antiplatelets, 4.4% of patients on concurrent antiplatelets with or without anticoagulants, and 6.1% of patients on concurrent anticoagulants with or without antiplatelets.(1) In an open-label, phase 2 trial of patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma on ibrutinib, 61 patients (55%) on concurrent anticoagulants or antiplatelets had a higher rate of bleeding (69% any grade, 8% grade 3-4) than patients not on anticoagulants or antiplatelets (28% any grade, 4% grade 3-4).(5) A retrospective trial found a hazard ratio of 20 (95% CI, 2.1-200) for patients on ibrutinib with concurrent anticoagulants and antiplatelets. There was a trend towards an increased bleeding risk in patients on either anticoagulants or antiplatelets, but this was not statistically significant on multivariate analysis.(6) A case report of 2 patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) on ibrutinib and dabigatran demonstrated no stroke nor bleeding events during the mean 11.5 month follow-up.(7) A case report of 4 patients with lymphoproliferative disease on concurrent dabigatran and ibrutinib demonstrated no stroke nor major bleeding events. 1 patient experienced grade 2 conjunctival hemorrhage whilst on both ibrutinib and dabigatran. The anticoagulant was withheld and successfully re-initiated at a lower dose with no further bleeding events.(8)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Adefovir
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Recommended doses of adefovir have been associated with delayed nephrotoxicity.(1-4) Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of adefovir with nephrotoxic agents such as intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, cyclosporine, tacrolimus,tenofovir, vancomycin, voclosporin and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents may result in renal toxicity.(1) Other nephrotoxic agents include capreomycin, cisplatin, gallium nitrate, high-dose methotrexate, intravenous pentamidine, and streptozocin.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients with pre-existing renal impairment(1,2) or receiving multiple nephrotoxic agents appear to be at greater risk for nephrotoxicity.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Evaluate renal function prior to initiation of concurrent therapy and continue renal function monitoring during therapy. Dose adjustments may be required for impaired renal function. Weigh the risks and benefits of concurrent therapy in patients with treatment-emergent nephrotoxicity.
DISCUSSION: Because of the known risks for adefovir nephrotoxicity, particularly at higher than recommended doses, the safety of adefovir has not been studied in patients receiving other known potentially nephrotoxic agents.
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Cisplatin
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The nephrotoxic effects of aminoglycosides or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may be additive to those of cisplatin.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The concurrent administration of amikacin, gentamicin, tobramycin, or NSAIDs with cisplatin may result in additive nephrotoxic effects.(1,2,5,6)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Pre-existing renal insufficiency, advanced age, dehydration may increase the risk of nephrotoxicity.(1,5,6)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US labeling for aminoglycosides and cisplatin states that the concurrent use of aminoglycosides and cisplatin should be avoided.(1,3,4,6) Inform patients that concurrent cisplatin and aminoglycosides or NSAIDs can cause nephrotoxicity and that renal function and electrolyte monitoring during treatment is necessary.(2)
DISCUSSION: The US manufacturers of amikacin, gentamicin and tobramycin state that since the nephrotoxic effects of these medications may be additive, avoid concurrent or sequential use of other neurotoxic and/or nephrotoxic agents including cisplatin.(1,3,6)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Immune Globulin Iv (Igiv)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Immune Globulin Intravenous (IGIV) products, particularly those containing sucrose, can cause renal dysfunction, acute renal failure, osmotic nephrosis, and/or death. Concurrent administration of other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function.(1-4)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of Immune Globulin Intravenous (IGIV) products with nephrotoxic agents such as adefovir, intravenous aminoglycosides, amphotericin B, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents, tenofovir, and vancomycin may result in renal toxicity.(1-4) Other nephrotoxic agents include capreomycin, gallium nitrate, and streptozocin.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients at risk of acute renal failure include those with any degree of pre-existing renal insufficiency, diabetes mellitus, advanced age (above 65 years of age), volume depletion, sepsis, paraproteinemia, or receiving known nephrotoxic drugs.(1-4) Renal dysfunction and acute renal failure occur more commonly in patients receiving IGIV products containing sucrose.(3-4)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: For patients at risk of renal dysfunction or renal failure, the US manufacturers of Immune Globulin Intravenous (IGIV) products recommends administration at the minimum dose and infusion rate practicable; ensure adequate hydration in patients before administration; and monitor renal function and urine output with assessment of blood urea nitrogen (BUN) and serum creatinine before initial infusion and at regular intervals during therapy.(1-3) Concurrent administration of potentially nephrotoxic agents should be avoided.(1) Review prescribing information for IGIV product to be administered for sucrose content. If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor renal function closely. In high risk patients, consider selecting an IGIV product that does not contain sucrose.
DISCUSSION: The safety of Immune Globulin Intravenous (IGIV) has not been studied in patients receiving other known potentially nephrotoxic agents. Renal impairment is a major toxicity of IGIV products.(1-3) A review of the FDA renal adverse events (RAEs) (i.e. acute renal failure or insufficiency) from June 1985 to November 1998 identified 120 reports worldwide associated with IGIV administration. In the US, the FDA received 88 reports of cases with clinical and/or laboratory findings consistent with RAE (i.e. increased serum creatinine, oliguria, and acute renal failure). Patient cases involved a median age of 60.5 years and 55% were male. Of the 54 patients who developed acute renal failure, 65% were greater than 65 years, 56% had diabetes, and 26% had prior renal insufficiency; 59% had one, 35% had two, and 6% had three of these conditions. Upon review of the IGIV product received, 90% of cases received sucrose-containing IGIV products with the remaining patients receiving either maltose- or glucose-containing products. Approximately 40% of affected patients required dialysis and RAE may have contributed to death in 15% of patients.(4)
Selected Nephrotoxic Agents/Tenofovir
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Tenofovir and other nephrotoxic agents may result in additive or synergistic effects on renal function and increase nephrotoxicity risk.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of tenofovir and other nephrotoxic agents may result in renal toxicity and acute renal failure.(1) Reports of acute renal failure and Fanconi syndrome have been reported with tenofovir use.(2,3) However, this has been reported in 3 case reports and the renal failure may have been complicated by other pre-existing conditions.(2)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Pre-existing renal dysfunction, long duration of use, low body weight, concomitant use of drugs that may increase tenofovir levels may increase the risk of nephrotoxicity.(1)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: The US prescribing information for tenofovir recommends avoiding concurrent or recent use of a nephrotoxic agent.(3) Evaluate renal function prior to initiation of concurrent therapy and continue renal function monitoring during therapy. Dose adjustments may be required for impaired renal function. Tenofovir should be avoided with high-dose or multiple NSAIDs. Alternatives to NSAIDs should be considered in patients at risk for renal dysfunction.(3) Patients receiving concurrent NSAIDs with tenofovir should be monitored for possible renal toxicity.(1,2) The dosing interval should be adjusted in patients with a baseline creatinine clearance of less than 50 ml/min.(1-3)
DISCUSSION: From March 18, 2003 to December 1, 2005, Health Canada received 10 reports of nephrotoxic reactions with tenofovir. Three of these occurred following the addition of a NSAID to tenofovir therapy. In the first report, a patient maintained on tenofovir for 29 months developed acute renal failure and acute tubular necrosis requiring dialysis 5 days after beginning indomethacin (100 mg rectally twice daily). In the second report, a patient maintained on tenofovir for 7 months developed acute renal failure and acute tubular necrosis after taking 90 tablets of naproxen (375 mg) over 2 months. The patient died. In the third report, a patient maintained on tenofovir for over a year developed acute renal failure and nephrotic syndrome after 2 months of valdecoxib (20 mg daily) therapy. Symptoms subsided following discontinuation of valdecoxib.(1)
Selected Nsaids/Aspirin (For Cardioprotection)
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Some non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) are reversible inhibitors of cyclooxygenase and aspirin is an irreversible inhibitor. If these NSAIDs are given before aspirin, the aspirin will not be able to bind to the cyclooxygenase site, which will result in a lack of effect.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The antiplatelet and cardioprotective effect of aspirin may be decreased with the concurrent use of some NSAIDs, particularly during the washout period of the NSAID.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Consideration should be given to use of an NSAID that does not interfere with the antiplatelet effect of aspirin, or a non-NSAID analgesic if appropriate. If an NSAID must be used, cardioprotective doses of aspirin should be administered before taking any NSAIDs. Single doses of ibuprofen should be given at least 8 hours before or at least 2 hours after immediate release aspirin. The administration of other NSAIDs should be separated from aspirin by at least 2 hours.
DISCUSSION: The cardioprotective effect from aspirin is based on the antiplatelet effects. The irreversible inhibition of cyclooxygenase mediates the antiplatelet effects. Administration of a reversible inhibitor or cyclooxygenase blocks the irreversible effect of aspirin on the platelets. This effect has been seen with celecoxib, flufenamic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, naproxen, nimesulide, oxaprozin, piroxicam, and tiaprofenic acid but not with diclofenac, etoricoxib, ketorolac, meloxicam, or sulindac. In a study of 80 healthy volunteers, aspirin antiplatelet activity, measured by % thromboxane B2 inhibition (TxB2), was decreased when naproxen 220 mg daily was given simultaneously with or 30 minutes before aspirin 81 mg daily for 10 days (98.7% aspirin alone vs 93.1% and 87.7% naproxen and aspirin). The interaction persisted at least 1 day following discontinuation of naproxen but was normalized by the 3rd day. In a nationwide cohort study, patients were evaluated for thromboembolic cardiovascular and clinically relevant bleeding events with concurrent antithrombotic and ongoing NSAID treatment. A total of 108,232 patients were followed for a mean of 2.3 +/- 1.8 years after diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Concomitant NSAID treatment significantly increased the risk for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR) 6.96; 95% CI 6.24 - 6.77; p<0.001) and bleeding events (HR 4.08; 95% CI 3.51 - 4.73; p<0.001) compared to no NSAID treatment. NSAIDs were further evaluated and revealed the use of celecoxib (HR: 4.65; 95% CI: 3.17 to 6.82; p < 0.001, and 3.44; 95% CI: 2.20 to 5.39; p < 0.001, respectively) and meloxicam (HR: 3.03; 95% CI: 1.68 to 5.47; p < 0.001, and 2.80; 95% CI: 1.40 to 5.60; p < 0.001, respectively) had the lowest risk for cardiovascular and bleeding events, receptively.
Selected Nsaids/Probenecid
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Probenecid may inhibit the renal tubular secretion of some NSAIDs. Probenecid may also prevent biliary clearance of NSAIDs.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The decreased clearance of NSAIDs may lead to increased blood levels and an increase in adverse effects.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients receiving concurrent therapy should be monitored for an increase in NSAID-related adverse effects, including renal insufficiency. The dose of the NSAID may need to be decreased or probenecid may need to be discontinued.
DISCUSSION: Probenecid has been reported to increase the blood levels of indomethacin by 2-fold to 6-fold.(1,2) Probenecid has been reported to increase levels of oral ketoprofen by 93%;(3) however, no effect was seen on intramuscular ketoprofen in another study.(4) Probenecid has also been shown to increase naproxen levels.(5) Probenecid has been shown to increase the maximum concentration (Cmax) of tenoxicam. No other pharmacokinetic parameters were affected.(6) This interaction may result in clinical benefits in some patients.
Selected Nsaids/Selected Cyp2c9 Inhibitors
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The major metabolic pathway for many non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) is CYP2C9. Inhibitors of CYP2C9 include: amiodarone, asciminib, diosmin, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, nitisinone, oxandrolone, piperine, voriconazole, and zafirlukast.(1,2)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of NSAIDs with inhibitors of CYP2C9 may result in increased levels of and adverse effects from NSAIDs, including increased risk for bleeding. NSAIDs linked to this monograph are celecoxib, diclofenac, flurbiprofen, ibuprofen, meloxicam, naproxen, parecoxib, piroxicam and valdecoxib.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Higher doses of either agent would be expected to increase the risk for serious adverse effects such as gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) or renal failure. Patients who smoke, are elderly, debilitated, dehydrated, have renal impairment, or who have a history of GIB due to NSAIDs are also at increased risk for serious adverse events.(3-7) The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g. NSAIDs).
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients on routine NSAID therapy when an inhibitor of CYP2C9 is started should be evaluated for patient-specific risk factors for NSAID toxicity. Based upon this risk assessment, consider dose reduction of the NSAID or close monitoring for adverse effects. For a patient already receiving a CYP2C9 inhibitor when an NSAID is started, consider initiating the NSAID at a lower than usual dose, particularly when predisposing risk factors for harm are present. The manufacturer of celecoxib recommends that celecoxib be introduced at the lowest recommended dose in patients receiving fluconazole therapy.(3) The manufacturer of fluconazole states that half the dose of celecoxib may be necessary when fluconazole is added.(4) It would be prudent to follow this recommendation with other CYP2C9 inhibitors and to decrease the dose of celecoxib in patients in whom CYP2C9 inhibitors are added to celecoxib therapy. The manufacturer of diclofenac-misoprostol states that the total daily dose of diclofenac should not exceed the lowest recommended dose of 50 mg twice daily in patients taking CYP2C9 inhibitors.(5) It would be prudent to use the lowest recommended dose of other diclofenac formulations in patients taking CYP2C9 inhibitors. The manufacturer of parecoxib states that the dose of parecoxib should be reduced in those patients who are receiving fluconazole therapy.(6) It would be prudent to follow this recommendation with other CYP2C9 inhibitors. The manufacturer of nitisinone recommends reducing the dosage of a CYP2C9 substrate by one-half.(7) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. When applicable, perform agent-specific laboratory test (e.g. INR, aPTT) to monitor efficacy and safety of anticoagulation. Discontinue anticoagulation in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: The concomitant administration of celecoxib and fluconazole (200 mg daily) resulted in a 2-fold increase in celecoxib plasma concentration.(3) In vitro studies in human hepatocytes found that amiodarone inhibited diclofenac metabolism.(8) In two separate studies, single doses of diclofenac (50 mg) or ibuprofen (400 mg) were coadministered with the last dose of voriconazole (400 mg q12h on Day 1, followed by 200 mg q12h on Day 2). Voriconazole increased the mean AUC of diclofenac by 78% and increased the AUC of the active isomer of ibuprofen by 100%.(9-11) Coadministration of diosmin increased diclofenac levels by 63%.(2) Coadministration of flurbiprofen or ibuprofen with fluconazole increased the AUC of flurbiprofen by 81% and of the active ibuprofen by 82% compared with either agent alone.(4) Concurrent voriconazole increased meloxicam AUC by 47%.(12,13) The concurrent administration of fluconazole and parecoxib resulted in increases in the area-under-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of valdecoxib (the active metabolite of parecoxib) by 62% and 19%, respectively.(6) In a study, single dose diclofenac (50mg) given concurrently with the last dose of voriconazole (400 mg every 12 hours on Day 1, 200 mg every 12 hours on Day 2) increased Cmax and AUC by 2.1-fold and 1.8-fold, respectively. (5) Inhibitors of CYP2C9 include: amiodarone, asciminib, camizestrant, diosmin, fluconazole, ketoconazole, miconazole, nitisinone, oxandrolone, piperine, voriconazole, and zafirlukast.(1,2)
Selected Nsaids/Triamterene; Amiloride
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The exact mechanism is unknown; however, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) inhibition of prostaglandins may allow triamterene or amiloride- induced nephrotoxicity or hyperkalemia to occur in some patients.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Possible renal failure or hyperkalemia.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Preexisting renal impairment.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: When possible, avoid concurrent therapy with triamterene or amiloride with NSAIDs. If these agents are used concurrently, monitor renal function and serum electrolytes. If decreased renal function or hyperkalemia develops, discontinue both agents.
DISCUSSION: Acute renal failure and hyperkalemia have been reported in patients receiving concurrent therapy with therapeutic doses of triamterene or amiloride with NSAIDs. Although a majority of these reports have involved indomethacin, other NSAIDs have been implicated (diclofenac, flurbiprofen, and ibuprofen).
Selected Nsaids; Aspirin/Ssris; Snris
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Serotonin release by platelets plays a role in hemostasis.(1,2) The increased risk of bleeding may be a result of a decrease in serotonin reuptake by platelets.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor(1-7,13) or a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor(8-10) and a NSAID may result in bleeding.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: The risk for bleeding episodes may be greater in patients with multiple disease-associated factors (e.g. thrombocytopenia, advanced liver disease). Drug associated risk factors include concurrent use of multiple drugs which inhibit anticoagulant/antiplatelet metabolism and/or have an inherent risk for bleeding (e.g., anticoagulants, antiplatelets, or corticosteroids. Risk of GI bleed may be increased in patients who are of older age, in poor health status, or who use alcohol or smoke. Risk may also be increased with longer duration of NSAID use and prior history of peptic ulcer disease and/or GI bleeding. Renal impairment has been associated with an elevated risk of GI bleed in patients on SSRIs.(15)
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors(1-7,13) or serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors(8-10) and NSAIDs should be used concurrently with caution. Patients should be warned about the increased risk of bleeding and be educated about signs and symptoms of bleeding.(1-11,13) If concurrent therapy is warranted, monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for signs of blood loss, including decreased hemoglobin, hematocrit, fecal occult blood, and/or decreased blood pressure and promptly evaluate patients with any symptoms. Discontinue anti-platelet agents in patients with active pathologic bleeding. Instruct patients to report any signs and symptoms of bleeding, such as unusual bleeding from the gums or nose; unusual bruising; red or black, tarry stools; red, pink or dark brown urine; acute abdominal or joint pain and/or swelling.
DISCUSSION: In a retrospective review of 5 years of data from the Pharmaco-Epidemiologic Prescription Database, hospitalizations for upper gastro-intestinal bleeding in antidepressant users were compared to those in non-antidepressant users. The risk of a bleed in a patient using an NSAID only based on an observed-expected ratio was 4.5 and in a patient using low-dose aspirin only was 2.5. Concurrent use of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor with NSAIDs or low-dose aspirin increased the risk of bleeding to 12.2 and 5.2, respectively.(11) In another study, there were 16 cases of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in patients receiving concurrent therapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and NSAIDs. Adjusted relative risk of bleeding with NSAIDs, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, or both were 3.7, 2.6, or 15.6, respectively.(12)
Selected Nsaids; Salicylates/Ace Inhibitors
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: NSAIDs inhibit prostaglandin synthesis which can lead to afferent arteriolar vasoconstriction and decreased renal blood flow. ACE inhibitors can cause vasodilation of the efferent renal arteriole which may result in decreased glomerular filtration rate.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of ACE inhibitors with NSAIDs may result in decreased antihypertensive effects. In patients with existing renal impairment, the use of these agents together may also result in further deterioration of renal clearance caused by renal hypoperfusion. Concurrent use of ACE inhibitors with NSAIDs and diuretics may result in increased risk of acute kidney injury (AKI).
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Low water intake/dehydration, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment may increase an individuals susceptibility to AKI.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients maintained on ACE inhibitors should be monitored for a loss of blood pressure control and a change in renal function if an NSAID is added to their regimen. Patients receiving concurrent therapy may require higher doses of ACE inhibitors. If blood pressure control cannot be achieved or if the patient's renal function deteriorates, the NSAID may need to be discontinued. Patients should be monitored for hypotension if NSAIDs are withdrawn from concurrent ACE inhibitor therapy. Concurrent use of ACE inhibitors with NSAIDs and diuretics should be used with caution and monitored closely for signs of AKI.
DISCUSSION: In a computational study, the risk of AKI using triple therapy (combination of a diuretic, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitor, and NSAID) was assessed. The study found the following factors may increase an individual's susceptibility to AKI: low water intake, drug sensitivity, greater than 75 years of age, and renal impairment.(30,31) In an observational study, current use of a triple therapy combination was associated with an increased rate of acute kidney injury (rate ratio (RR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12-1.53). The highest risk of AKI associated with triple therapy were observed in the first 30 days of use (RR 1.82, CI 1.35-2.46).(32) Indomethacin has been shown to inhibit the antihypertensive effect of captopril, cilazapril, enalapril, losartan, perindopril, and valsartan. Ibuprofen has been shown to decrease the antihypertensive effects of captopril. Two separate case reports describe individuals suspected of ACEI-associated angioedema precipitated by NSAIDs. Both cases reported symptom resolution after cessation of the NSAID. Studies have shown that sulindac does not affect the antihypertensive effects of captopril and enalapril. One or more of the drug pairs linked to this monograph have been included in a list of interactions that could be considered for classification as "non-interruptive" in EHR systems. This DDI subset was vetted by an expert panel commissioned by the U.S. Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health Information Technology.
Selected Opioid Analgesics/Cimetidine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: The metabolism of selected opioid analgesics may be inhibited by cimetidine.(1-15) At doses of 800-2400 mg daily, cimetidine is a moderate inhibitor of CYP3A4 and a weak inhibitor of CYP1A2, CYP2C19, CYP2C9, and CYP2D6.(16) Benzhydrocodone is a prodrug of hydrocodone.(12)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The effect of selected opioid analgesics may be increased including profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death. Opioid analgesics have been associated with histamine release and is dependent on dose, route of administration, and rate of administration. Histamine release can cause arteriole dilation and contribute to a profound decrease in systemic blood pressure. The cardiovascular effects of histamine release occurring with the opioid analgesics may be decreased by giving cimetidine concurrently.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: None determined.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Cimetidine use at higher doses of 200-400 mg four times daily would have an increased risk of inhibiting the metabolism of opioid analgesics. Lower doses and over-the-counter doses of cimetidine would be expected to have a diminished effect. Consider using alternative H2 antagonists when long-term concurrent therapy with opioid analgesics is indicated. The manufacturer of sufentanil sublingual tablets states that if concomitant use with CYP3A4 inhibitors is necessary, consider use of an alternate agent that allows dose adjustment.(15) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(17) Monitor the patient for increased adverse effects of the opioid analgesic including respiratory and central nervous system depression, unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness. Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(18)
DISCUSSION: Severe respiratory depression has been reported with the concurrent administration of opioid analgesics and cimetidine. Systemic levels of opioid analgesics metabolized by CYP3A4 may be increased during concurrent use with cimetidine, a CYP3A4 inhibitor.(1-15) In a study of 6 healthy subjects, the effects of ketoconazole (a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor) 400 mg daily for 3 days on alfentanil were studied. The maximum concentration (Cmax) and area-under-curve (AUC) of alfentanil were increased with both sequential and simultaneous dosing of alfentanil with concurrent ketoconazole.(19) In a study of 16 healthy subjects, the effects of ketoconazole 300 mg twice daily for 2 days on fentanyl 5 mcg/kg single dose were examined. Fentanyl AUC was increased by 133% and clearance was reduced to 78%. The metabolism of fentanyl to norfentanyl by CYP3A4 was delayed and partial metabolic clearance decreased by 18% with concurrent ketoconazole.(20) In vitro results of the effects of ketoconazole on hydrocodone confirmed CYP3A4 is responsible for the metabolism of hydrocodone to norhydrocodone.(21) A review discussed the metabolism of hydrocodone by CYP2D6 to O-demethylated hydromorphone and by CYP3A4 to N-demethylated norhydrocodone. CYP3A4 activity is reported as higher in women resulting in higher fractions of the norhydrocodone metabolite in women than in men.(22) A case report of a 46 year old hemodialysis patient was on routine therapy with phenytoin 100 mg three times daily and cimetidine 300 mg three times daily. Four days after starting cimetidine, morphine 15 mg IM every 4 hours was initiated for pain. After the sixth dose of morphine, the patient was apneic with a respiratory rate of 3 breaths/minute and had a grand mal seizure. The patient responded to naloxone 0.4 mg IV single dose with improvement in respiratory rate to 12 breaths/minute. Cimetidine was stopped and phenytoin decreased to 100 mg twice daily with improvement after 80 hours from initial episode. A month later the patient required surgery and was given cimetidine 150 mg twice daily followed by Pantopon 15 mg IM every 3-6 hours postoperatively for pain. The patient again became apneic, confused, and developed muscle twitching which responded to naloxone 0.4 mg for 4 doses over the next 24 hours with complete recovery.(23) In a study of 8 healthy subjects, the effects of cimetidine on morphine were studied. Subjects were evaluated in three study periods: morphine 10 mg IM single dose; cimetidine 600 mg oral given one hour before morphine 10 mg IM single dose; and cimetidine 600 mg oral single dose. Morphine reduced resting ventilation and increased end-tidal CO2 with peak effects at 120 minutes and resolution at 12 hours. Morphine with cimetidine pretreatment had similar effects on resting ventilation and end-tidal CO2, however the recovery ratio from 120 to 720 minutes was significantly different than morphine alone (p<0.05).(24) In a study of 7 healthy subjects, the effects of cimetidine 300 mg oral four times daily for 4 days on morphine 10 mg IV single dose were evaluated. No significant differences were found in morphine concentrations at any time point from zero to ten hours after dose administration with and without cimetidine. Morphine elimination half-life (t1/2), systemic clearance, volume of distribution, and AUC with and without cimetidine had no statistical differences.(25) In a study of 40 patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass graft surgery were randomized to receive either cimetidine 4 mg/kg, diphenhydramine 1 mg/kg, a combination of both cimetidine and diphenhydramine, or placebo, followed by morphine 1 mg/kg. Patients were randomized to one of four groups: 1. placebo plus morphine; 2. cimetidine plus morphine; 3. diphenhydramine plus morphine; or 4. cimetidine plus diphenhydramine plus morphine. Patients in group 1 had a 10-fold increase in plasma histamine levels within 2 minutes of morphine with a decrease in mean BP, diastolic BP, and systemic vascular resistance (SVR). Group 2 has similar effects with a peak change in SVR and plasma histamine rise within 2 minutes of morphine. The change in SVR was significant when compared to placebo but less than group 1. Group 3 patients had an increase in heart rate (HR) from diphenhydramine alone as well as peak effects within 2 minutes of morphine with decreases in BP and SVR but were less than morphine alone. Group 4 patients had a 7-fold increase in histamine with a significant increase in HR, diastolic BP, and BP. When group 4 is compared to group 1, patients had a decrease in SVR and diastolic BP that was significantly less despite comparable increases in plasma histamine.(26) In vitro testing of oxycodone and methadone, cimetidine caused a greater than 50% inhibition in all pathways: CYP2B6, CYP3A4, CYP2C18, and CYP2D6. Cimetidine was found to be a weak reversible inhibitor in vitro. Extrapolation of the data to in vivo inhibition is unlikely to produce significant inhibition unless concentrations exceed normal doses by 10-fold.(27) Two studies examined the effects of CYP2D6 and CYP3A4 on the metabolism of oxycodone as well as genetic polymorphism influences. After concurrent administration of oxycodone with ketoconazole, the Cmax of the metabolites noroxycodone and noroxymorphone were decreased by 80% from baseline.(28,29) A review discussed the metabolism of oxycodone by CYP3A4 to noroxycodone, the major metabolite with weak antinociceptive properties, and by CYP2D6 to the active minor metabolite oxymorphone.(30) In a study of 8 male subjects, effects of cimetidine 600 mg twice daily for seven days on pethidine 70 mg IV single dose was evaluated. Concurrent use with cimetidine was associated with a 22% decrease in clearance, 11% decrease in elimination rate, and a 13% decrease in volume of distribution of pethidine. Changes were also seen in norpethidine, the primary metabolite, with a 23% decrease in AUC and 29% decrease in Cmax.(31) Opioid analgesics linked to this monograph include: alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, dihydrocodeine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, meptazinol, nalbuphine, oxycodone, oxymorphone, pentazocine, propoxyphene, and sufentanil.
Selected Opioids (Immediate Release)/Metaxalone
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and metaxalone may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as the muscle relaxant metaxalone, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as the muscle relaxant metaxalone to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(4) A retrospective cohort study compared the risk of opioid overdose associated with concomitant use of opioids and skeletal muscle relaxants versus opioid use alone. The study examined two types of opioid users (naive opioid use and prevalent opioid use) with and without exposure to skeletal muscle relaxants. The adjusted hazard ratios (HR) were 1.09 and 1.26 in the naive and prevalent opioid user cohorts, respectively, generating a combined estimate of 1.21. The risk increased with treatment duration (less than or equal to 14 days: 0.91; 15-60 days: 1.37; and greater than 60 days: 1.80) and for the use of baclofen and carisoprodol (HR 1.83 and 1.84, respectively). Elevated risk was associated with concomitant users with daily opioid dose greater than 50 mg and benzodiazepine use (HR 1.50 and 1.39, respectively).(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10)
Selected Opioids/Barbiturates; Phenobarbital; Primidone
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: There are two mechanisms involved in this interaction. Pharmacokinetic: alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil are primarily metabolized by CYP3A4/5 and glucuronidation pathways.(1-8) Phenobarbital is an inducer of these pathways. Pharmacodynamic: both opioids and barbiturates are associated with respiratory depression; these effects may be additive.(1,3,9) Benzhydrocodone is a prodrug of hydrocodone.(2) Primidone is metabolized to phenobarbital.
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Short term or intermittent use of phenobarbital and opioids metabolized by CYP3A4 may be associated with respiratory suppression or other CNS depression. Continuous, longer term use of phenobarbital may result in decreased levels and effectiveness of the opioid. Induction of meperidine metabolism may result in an increase in levels of normeperidine, the toxic metabolite of meperidine, resulting in a higher risk of excitatory effects, including hallucinations, tremors, and seizures.(6,10)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Patients with a history of alcohol or sedative abuse may be at risk for relapse and overuse or abuse of prescribed phenobarbital.(1,3,5,11) Individuals with significant obstructive pulmonary disease, the elderly, and debilitated patients are at greater risk for respiratory depression from either agent.(1,3) Induction effects may be more likely with regular use of the inducer for longer than 1-2 weeks.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients on chronic therapy with phenobarbital who are newly starting opioids metabolized by CYP3A4 may need higher than usual doses of the opioid for analgesia or opioid maintenance.(1,3,12) Opioid-treated patients newly started on phenobarbital should be monitored initially for additive CNS sedation or respiratory depression, particularly when predisposing factors (e.g. COPD, sleep apnea, debilitation, elderly) are present. Continued use of phenobarbital leads to induction of the opioids' metabolism. The onset is gradual and may not peak for several weeks. Monitor patient for possible loss of efficacy or opioid withdrawal. If a patient has been maintained on concurrent treatment with an opioid metabolized by CYP3A4 and phenobarbital, and the phenobarbital is discontinued, opioid levels will gradually rise as induction effects diminish. Monitor for increased opioid effects and adjust the dose accordingly.(1,3,12) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(13) For patients receiving opioid maintenance treatment, it would be prudent to assure all controlled substance prescriptions are approved or written by the opioid provider. Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(14)
DISCUSSION: Alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, oxycodone, and sufentanil are metabolized by CYP3A4, and barbiturates, phenobarbital, and primidone would be expected to induce their metabolism.(1,2,4-6) Newer metabolites and minor metabolic pathways for buprenorphine have been recently described. Phenobarbital, an inducer of multiple enzyme pathways (e.g. CYP2B, CYP2C, CYP3A and UGT) could potentially lower systemic buprenorphine levels via major and minor pathways.(12)
Selected Opioids/Selected Moderate Cyp3a4 Inhibitors
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Inhibitors of CYP3A4 may inhibit the metabolism of alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl,(1) hydrocodone, meperidine,(2) oxycodone,(3) and sufentanil.(4)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: The concurrent administration of a CYP3A4 inhibitor may result in elevated levels of and toxicity from alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, fentanyl,(1,5) hydrocodone, meperidine,(2) oxycodone(3) and sufentanil(4), including somnolence and potentially fatal respiratory depression.
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Heat.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Monitor patients receiving moderate CYP3A4 inhibitors for an extended period of time. Dosage adjustments should be made if warranted. The manufacturer of sufentanil sublingual tablets states that if concomitant use with CYP3A4 inhibitors is necessary, consider use of an alternate agent that allows dose adjustment.(4) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(6) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(7) Avoid exposing the fentanyl patch application site and surrounding area to direct external heat sources as there have been reports of overdose and death as a result of exposure to heat.(1)
DISCUSSION: Fentanyl(1) and oxycodone(3) are metabolized by the CYP3A4 isoenzyme. Moderate and strong inhibitors of this isoenzyme are expected to increase fentanyl(1) and oxycodone(3) levels. In a single dose study of sufentanil sublingual tablet 15 mcg with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor, ketoconazole, resulted in 77% and 19% greater AUC and Cmax values of sufentanil, respectively, compared to its administration alone.(4) In a randomized study in 30 patients, continuous diltiazem (1 mcg/kg/min) infusion had no effect on epidural fentanyl consumption when compared to placebo. There were no significant differences in Visual Analogue Scores (VAS), Verbal Rating Scores (VRS), or incidence of side effects, although there was a trend towards increased nausea with concurrent diltiazem.(5) In a randomized study of coronary artery bypass patients, concurrent diltiazem (60 mg orally 2 hours before induction of anesthesia then 0.1 mg/kg/hr infusion) increased the area-under-curve (AUC) and half-life of alfentanil by 40% and 50%, respectively, when compared to placebo. Patients who received diltiazem were extubated an average of 2.5 hours later than in patients who received placebo.(8) In a study in 13 patients, administration of a single dose of verapamil (75mcg/kg to 150mcg/kg) had no significant effects on the pharmacodynamic effects of a single dose of fentanyl; however, individual patients had modest decreases in blood pressure.(9) In a case report, concurrent diltiazem and fentanyl produced delirium.(10) A study in healthy subjects shown that the application of heat over the fentanyl patch system increased mean overall fentanyl exposure by 120% and average maximum fentanyl level by 61%.(1) Moderate inhibitors of CYP3A4 include: amprenavir, aprepitant, atazanavir, avacopan, berotralstat, clofazimine, conivaptan, darunavir, diltiazem, dronedarone, duvelisib, fedratinib, fosamprenavir, fosnetupitant, imatinib, isavuconazonium, lenacapavir, letermovir, netupitant, nilotinib, rilzabrutinib, schisandra, stiripentol, treosulfan, and verapamil.(11,12)
Selected Opioids/Selected Strong Cyp3a4 Inducers
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Strong inducers of CYP3A4 may induce the metabolism of alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, buprenorphine,(1) fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine,(2-4) morphine,(5) oxycodone, papaveretum, and sufentanil.(6)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of a strong CYP3A4 inducer may result in decreased levels of alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, morphine, oxycodone, papaveretum, and sufentanil, which may result in decreased effectiveness and may precipitate withdrawal symptoms.(1-6) Induction of meperidine metabolism may result in an increase in levels of normeperidine, the toxic metabolite of meperidine, resulting in a higher risk of excitatory effects, including hallucinations, tremors, and seizures.(2,3)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Induction effects may be more likely with regular use of the inducer for longer than 1-2 weeks.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Patients maintained on alfentanil, benzhydrocodone, buprenorphine, fentanyl, hydrocodone, meperidine, morphine, oxycodone, papaveretum, and sufentanil may require dosage adjustments if a strong CYP3A4 inducer is initiated or discontinued. The effects of the interaction may last for several weeks after the discontinuation of the inducer. Patients who transfer to Sublocade (extended release subcutaneous syringe buprenorphine) from transmucosal buprenorphine used concomitantly with CYP3A4 inducers should be monitored to ensure that the plasma buprenorphine level produced by Sublocade is adequate. If patients already on Sublocade require newly-initiated treatment with CYP3A4 inducer, the patient should be monitored for withdrawal. If the dose of Sublocade is not adequate in the absence of the concomitant medication, and the concomitant medication cannot be reduced or discontinued, the patient should be transitioned back to a formulation of buprenorphine that permits dose adjustment. If a patient has been stabilized on Sublocade with a CYP3A4 inducer and the concomitant medication is discontinued, the patient should be monitored for signs and symptoms of over-medication. Within 2 weeks of Sublocade administration, if the dose provided by Sublocade is excessive in the absence of the concomitant inducer, it may be necessary to remove the Sublocade and treat the patient with a formulation of buprenorphine that permits dose adjustments.(15) The manufacturer of sufentanil sublingual tablets states that if concomitant use with CYP3A4 inducers is necessary, consider use of an alternate agent that allows dose adjustment.(6)
DISCUSSION: In a study in 12 opoid-dependent patients, rifampin (600 mg daily) decreased the area-under-curve (AUC) of buprenorphine by 70%. Half of the subjects experienced withdrawal symptoms. When compared to historical values, there was no effect on rifampin levels.(1) In a study of four healthy volunteers, phenytoin increased meperidine clearance from 1017 +/- 225 ml/min (mean +/- SD) to 1280 +/- 130 ml/min and decreased half-life from 6.4 hours to 4.3 hours. Phenytoin also increased normeperidine AUC by 1.53-fold after IV meperidine and by 1.25-fold after oral meperidine.(3) In a study in 10 healthy subjects, pretreatment with rifampin (600 mg daily) for 13 days decreased the area-under-curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) of a single dose of morphine by 28% and 41%, respectively. The AUCs of morphine-3-glucuronide and morphine-6-glucuronide were proportionally decreased as well. Following rifampin pretreatment, no analgesic effects of morphine were seen.(5) In a randomized controlled trial of 12 healthy participants St. John's wort decreased the oxycodone AUC by 50%, shortened the oxycodone elimination half-life, and decreased the self-reported drug effect of oxycodone compared to placebo.(7) In a study in 12 healthy subjects, pretreatment with rifampin had no effect on fentanyl Cmax or time to Cmax (Tmax) after administration of oral transmucosal fentanyl. However, fentanyl AUC decreased 62%.(8) In a study in 9 healthy subjects, rifampin increased the clearance of alfentanil by 169%. Alfentanil half-life decreased 61%.(9) In a study of patients undergoing craniotomy, higher fentanyl maintenance doses were required in patients receiving carbamazepine and phenytoin compared to control subjects not receiving enzyme-inducing agents.(10) There are case reports of decreased levels and effectiveness of oxycodone with concurrent phenytoin(11) and rifampin(12) and with concurrent fentanyl and rifampin.(13-14) Selected strong CYP3A4 inducers linked to this monograph include: apalutamide, carbamazepine, encorafenib, enzalutamide, fosphenytoin, ivosidenib, lumacaftor, mitotane, phenytoin, rifampin, rifapentine, and St. John's Wort.
Slt Opioids (Immediate Release)/Antipsychotics;Phenothiazine
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and antipsychotics, including phenothiazine derivatives, may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants, such as antipsychotics, including phenothiazine derivatives, may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as antipsychotics, including phenothiazine derivatives, to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: A nested case-control study looked at the relationship between antipsychotic use and risk of acute respiratory failure. Current use of antipsychotics was associated with a 2.33-fold increase in risk of respiratory failure compared to no use of antipsychotics. The risk was also significantly increased in patients with recent use of antipsychotics (within the past 15-30 days, OR = 1.79) and recent past use (within 31-90 days OR = 1.41). The risk increased with higher doses and longer duration of use.(4) Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10)
Slt Opioids (Immediate Release)/Ziprasidone
SEVERITY LEVEL: 3-Moderate Interaction: Assess the risk to the patient and take action as needed.
MECHANISM OF ACTION: Concurrent use of opioids and antipsychotics such as ziprasidone may result in additive CNS depression.(1)
CLINICAL EFFECTS: Concurrent use of opioids and other CNS depressants such as ziprasidone may result in profound sedation, respiratory depression, coma, and/or death.(1)
PREDISPOSING FACTORS: Concurrent use of alcohol or other CNS depressants may increase the risk of adverse effects.
PATIENT MANAGEMENT: Limit prescribing opioid analgesics with CNS depressants such as antipsychotics, including ziprasidone, to patients for whom alternatives are ineffective, not tolerated, or would be otherwise inadequate to provide sufficient management of pain.(1) If concurrent use is necessary, limit the dosages and duration of each drug to the minimum possible while achieving the desired clinical effect. If starting a CNS depressant (for an indication other than epilepsy) with an opioid analgesic, prescribe a lower initial dose of the CNS depressant than indicated in the absence of an opioid and titrate based upon clinical response. If an opioid analgesic is indicated in a patient already taking a CNS depressant, prescribe a lower dose of the opioid and titrate based upon clinical response.(1) Respiratory depression can occur at any time during opioid therapy, especially during therapy initiation and following dosage increases. The risk of opioid-related overdose or overdose-related death is increased with higher opioid doses, and this risk persists over the course of therapy. Consider these risks when using concurrently with other agents that may cause CNS depression.(2) Monitor patients receiving concurrent therapy for unusual dizziness or lightheadedness, extreme sleepiness, slowed or difficult breathing, or unresponsiveness.(1) Discuss opioid reversal agents (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) with all patients when prescribing or renewing an opioid analgesic or medicine to treat opioid use disorder (OUD). Consider prescribing an opioid reversal agent (e.g., naloxone, nalmefene) to patients prescribed medicines to treat OUD or opioid analgesics who are at increased risk of opioid overdose (such as those taking CNS depressants) and when a patient has household members/close contacts at risk for accidental overdose. Discuss the options for obtaining an opioid reversal agent (e.g., prescription, over-the-counter, or as part of a community-based program).(3)
DISCUSSION: A nested case-control study looked at the relationship between antipsychotic use and risk of acute respiratory failure. Current use of antipsychotics was associated with a 2.33-fold increase in risk of respiratory failure compared to no use of antipsychotics. The risk was also significantly increased in patients with recent use of antipsychotics (within the past 15-30 days, OR = 1.79) and recent past use (within 31-90 days OR = 1.41). The risk increased with higher doses and longer duration of use.(4) Between 2002 and 2014, the number of patients receiving an opioid analgesic increased 8%, from 75 million to 81 million patients, and the number of patients receiving a benzodiazepine increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients. During this time, the proportion of patients receiving concurrent therapy increased 31%, from 23 million to 30 million patients.(5) From 2004 to 2011, the rate of nonmedical use-related emergency room visits involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 11 to 34.2 per 100,000 and drug overdose deaths involving both opioids and benzodiazepines increased from 0.6 to 1.7 per 100,000. The proportion of prescription opioid analgesic deaths which also involved benzodiazepines increased from 18% to 31% during this time.(6) A prospective observational cohort study in North Carolina found that the rates of overdose death among patients co-dispensed opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines were 10 times higher than patients receiving opioid analgesics alone.(7) A case-cohort study of VA data from 2004-2009 found that the risk of death from overdose increased with concomitant opioid analgesics and benzodiazepines. Compared to patients with no history of benzodiazepines, patients with a history of benzodiazepine use (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.33) and patients with a current benzodiazepine prescription (HR=3.86) had an increased risk of fatal overdose.(8) A study found that opioid analgesics contributed to 77% of deaths in which benzodiazepines were determined to be a cause of death and that benzodiazepines contributed to 30% of deaths in which opioid analgesics were determined to be a cause of death. This study also found that other CNS depressants (including barbiturates, antipsychotic and neuroleptic drugs, antiepileptic and antiparkinsonian drugs, anesthetics, autonomic nervous system drugs, and muscle relaxants) were contributory to death in many cases where opioid analgesics were also implicated.(9) A study found that alcohol was involved in 18.5% of opioid analgesic abuse-related ED visits and 22.1 percent of opioid analgesic-related deaths.(10)
Contraindications
*Significant respiratory depression.
*Acute or severe bronchial asthma in an unmonitored setting or in the absence of resuscitative equipment.
*Known or suspected GI obstruction, including paralytic ileus.
*Hypersensitivity to hydrocodone or any ingredient in the formulations.
*Ibuprofen is contraindicated in patients with known hypersensitivity (e.g., anaphylaxis, serious dermatologic reactions) to the drug or any ingredient in the formulation.
*Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIAs) generally are contraindicated in patients in whom asthma, urticaria, or other sensitivity reactions are precipitated by aspirin or other NSAIAs, since there is potential for cross-sensitivity between NSAIAs and aspirin, and severe, potentially fatal, bronchospasm can occur in such patients.
*NSAIAs are contraindicated in the setting of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.
Contraindications with IV Ibuprofen Lysine for PDA
*Neonates with proven or suspected untreated infection.
*Neonates with active bleeding, such as those with intracranial hemorrhage or GI bleeding, and in neonates with thrombocytopenia or underlying coagulation defect.
*Neonates with suspected necrotizing enterocolitis.
*Neonates with substantially impaired renal function.
*Neonates with congenital heart disease when patency of the ductus arteriosus is necessary for adequate pulmonary or systemic blood flow (e.g., neonates with pulmonary atresia, severe tetralogy of Fallot, or severe coarctation of the aorta).
- Acute asthma attack
- Aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease
- Cerebrovascular accident
- History of roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- Paralytic ileus
- Post-operative from CABG surgery
- Pregnancy
- Renal transplant
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Acute pancreatitis
- Alcohol intoxication
- Alcohol use disorder
- Chronic kidney disease stage 4 (severe) GFR 15-29 ml/min
- Chronic kidney disease stage 5 (failure) GFr<15 ml/min
- CYp2c9 intermediate metabolizer (activity score 1)
- CYp2c9 poor metabolizer
- Disease of liver
- Drug abuse
- Exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- Familial dysautonomia
- Gastrointestinal obstruction
- Gastrointestinal perforation
- Gastrointestinal ulcer
- Hemorrhage
- History of kidney donation
- History of opioid overdose
- Increased risk of bleeding
- Intracranial hypertension
- Kidney disease with reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFr)
- Nephrectomy
- Respiratory depression
- Shock
- Sleep apnea
- Systemic mastocytosis
- Thrombotic disorder
- Adrenocortical insufficiency
- Alcohol withdrawal delirium
- Benign prostatic hyperplasia
- Biliary tract disorder
- Chronic heart failure
- Constipation
- Cor pulmonale
- Debilitation
- Disease of liver
- Hypercapnia
- Hypertension
- Hypotension
- Kidney disease with likely reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFr)
- Lower seizure threshold
- Seizure disorder
- Tobacco smoker
- Toxic psychosis
- Untreated hypothyroidism
- Urethral stricture
- Urinary retention
Adverse reactions
The most common adverse effects reported in patients receiving hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release tablets are constipation, nausea, vomiting, fatigue, upper respiratory tract infection, dizziness, headache, and somnolence; common adverse effects in patients receiving hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release capsules include constipation, nausea, somnolence, fatigue, headache, dizziness, dry mouth, vomiting, pruritus, abdominal pain, peripheral edema, upper respiratory tract infection, muscle spasms, urinary tract infection, back pain, and tremor.
Adverse effects reported in at least 5% of adults receiving IV ibuprofen include nausea, flatulence, vomiting, headache, hemorrhage, and dizziness.
Adverse effects reported in at least 2% of pediatric patients receiving IV ibuprofen include infusion site pain, vomiting, nausea, anemia, and headache.
The most common type of adverse effect occurring with ibuprofen tablets is GI, and was reported in 4-16% of patients in clinical studies.
Adverse effects occurring in 1-10% of patients receiving ibuprofen oral suspension include abnormal renal function, anemia, dizziness, edema, elevated transaminases, fluid retention, GI effects (e.g., abdominal pain, bloating, constipation, diarrhea, dyspepsia, epigastric pain, flatulence, heartburn, nausea, vomiting), headaches, increased bleeding times, nervousness, pruritis, rashes (including maculopapular), and tinnitus.
Adverse effects occurring in at least 10% of premature infants receiving IV ibuprofen lysine for the treatment of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) include sepsis, anemia, intraventricular bleeding, apnea, GI disorders, impaired renal function, respiratory infection, skin lesions, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, and respiratory failure.
More Frequent
- Skin rash
Less Frequent
- Angioedema
- Atelectasis
- Body fluid retention
- Bradycardia
- Bronchospastic pulmonary disease
- CNS depression
- Dyspnea
- Edema
- Laryngeal edema
- Laryngismus
- Pruritus of skin
- Respiratory depression
- Tachycardia
- Tinnitus
Rare or Very Rare
- Abnormal hepatic function tests
- Abnormal vaginal bleeding
- Accidental fall
- Acute cognitive impairment
- Acute myocardial infarction
- Acute pancreatitis
- Adrenocortical insufficiency
- Agranulocytosis
- Allergic dermatitis
- Allergic dermatitis
- Altered mental status
- Anaphylaxis
- Anaphylaxis
- Anemia
- Angioedema
- Aphthous stomatitis
- Aplastic anemia
- Biliary spasm
- Bloody stools
- Bloody vomit
- Blurred vision
- Bronchospastic pulmonary disease
- Bullous dermatitis
- Cardiac arrhythmia
- Cerebrovascular accident
- Chest pain
- Chest tightness
- Chronic heart failure
- Conjunctivitis
- Cystitis
- Dehydration
- Depression
- Depression
- Diplopia
- Disorder of adrenal gland
- DRESS syndrome
- Drug dependence
- Drug-induced hepatitis
- Dry eye
- Dyspnea
- Eosinophilia
- Epistaxis
- Erythema multiforme
- Esophageal ulcer
- Exfoliative dermatitis
- Female hypogonadism
- Gastric ulcer
- Gastritis
- Gastrointestinal hemorrhage
- Gastrointestinal perforation
- Gastrointestinal ulcer
- Hallucinations
- Hallucinations
- Hearing loss
- Hematuria
- Hemolytic anemia
- Hepatitis
- Hyperkalemia
- Hypertension
- Hypertension
- Hypokalemia
- IgA vasculitis
- Ileus
- Increased cerebrospinal fluid pressure
- Involuntary muscle movement
- Ischemic colitis
- Jaundice
- Kidney disease with reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFr)
- Laryngeal edema
- Leukopenia
- Lupus-like syndrome
- Male hypogonadism
- Mood changes
- Muscle rigidity
- Nephrotoxicity
- Neutropenic disorder
- Non-infective meningitis
- Pancreatitis
- Pancytopenia
- Paralytic ileus
- Peptic ulcer
- Peripheral neuropathy
- Polyuria
- Renal failure
- Renal papillary necrosis
- Renal tubular necrosis
- Rhinitis
- Scotomata
- Seizure disorder
- Serum sickness
- Skin rash
- Sleep apnea
- Stevens-johnson syndrome
- Thrombocytopenic disorder
- Tinnitus
- Toxic amblyopia
- Toxic epidermal necrolysis
- Urticaria
- Urticaria
- Vasculitis
- Visual changes
- Wheezing
- Worsening of chronic heart failure
More Frequent
- Constipation
- Dizziness
- Dizziness
- Drowsy
- General weakness
- Heartburn
- Hypotension
- Malaise
- Nausea
- Nausea
- Sedation
- Syncope
Less Frequent
- Acute abdominal pain
- Acute abdominal pain
- Acute cognitive impairment
- Anorexia
- Anorexia
- Arthralgia
- Back pain
- Blurred vision
- Constipation
- Diarrhea
- Diplopia
- Dyspepsia
- Dysphoric mood
- False sense of well-being
- Fatigue
- Flatulence
- Flushing
- Gastric acid hypersecretory conditions
- Gastroesophageal reflux disease
- Headache disorder
- Headache disorder
- Hyperhidrosis
- Irritability
- Lethargy
- Mood changes
- Muscle spasm
- Myalgia
- Nervousness
- Nervousness
- Night sweats
- Opioid dependence
- Orthostatic hypotension
- Peripheral edema
- Symptoms of anxiety
- Tremor
- Upper respiratory infection
- Ureteral spasm
- Urinary tract infection
- Visual changes
- Vomiting
- Vomiting
- Xerostomia
Rare or Very Rare
- Androgen deficiency
- Ataxia
- Drowsy
- Dysgeusia
- Dysphagia
- Ecchymosis
- Elevated serum amylase
- Erectile dysfunction
- Flushing
- Gastrointestinal irritation
- Hearing loss
- Infertility
- Insomnia
- Insomnia
- Libido changes
- Migraine
- Mouth irritation
- Musculoskeletal pain
- Neck pain
- Nightmares
- Non-cardiac chest pain
- Opioid induced allodynia
- Opioid induced hyperalgesia
- Palpitations
- Palpitations
- Paresthesia
- Pruritus of skin
- Skin photosensitivity
- Symptoms of anxiety
- Tachycardia
- Xerostomia
Precautions
No enhanced messaging available.
The safety and effectiveness of hydrocodone bitartrate extended-release capsules and tablets have not been established in pediatric patients.
The manufacturers state that the safety and efficacy of oral ibuprofen in children <6 months of age have not been established.
Pediatric patients receiving ibuprofen dosages exceeding 30 mg/kg daily and those who have had abnormal liver function test results associated with prior NSAIA therapy should be carefully monitored for signs and symptoms of early liver dysfunction.
Safety and efficacy of IV ibuprofen have been established for treatment of pain and fever in pediatric patients 3 months of age and older. Use of IV ibuprofen for these indications is supported by evidence from one open-label and acetaminophen-controlled study of fever, as well as additional safety data from four studies in 164 pediatric patients, supportive pediatric data from other approved ibuprofen preparations, and evidence from adequate and well-controlled studies in adults. The most common adverse effects of IV ibuprofen in pediatric patients are infusion site pain, vomiting, nausea, anemia, and headache. Efficacy of IV ibuprofen for relief of pain or reduction of fever has not been established in pediatric patients <3 months of age.
Long-term follow-up (beyond a postconceptional age of 36 weeks) of premature neonates receiving ibuprofen lysine for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has not been conducted. The effects of ibuprofen on neurodevelopmental outcome, growth, and other complications of prematurity (e.g., retinopathy of prematurity, chronic lung disease) have not been assessed.
Safety and efficacy of ibuprofen lysine have been established only in premature infants.
Use of opioid analgesics for an extended period of time during pregnancy may cause neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome.
Available data with extended-release hydrocodone preparations in pregnant women are insufficient to inform a drug-associated risk for major birth defects and miscarriage.
Opioids cross the placenta and may produce respiratory depression and psycho-physiologic effects in neonates. An opioid antagonist, such as naloxone, must be available for reversal of opioid-induced respiratory depression in the neonate. Monitor neonates exposed to opioid analgesics during labor for signs of excessive sedation and respiratory depression.
Use of NSAIAs during pregnancy at about 30 weeks' gestation or later can cause premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus, and use at about 20 weeks' gestation or later has been associated with fetal renal dysfunction resulting in oligohydramnios and, in some cases, neonatal renal impairment. Because of these risks, use of NSAIAs should be avoided in pregnant women at about 30 weeks' gestation or later; if NSAIA therapy is necessary between about 20 and 30 weeks' gestation, the lowest effective dosage and shortest possible duration of treatment should be used. Monitoring of amniotic fluid volume via ultrasound examination should be considered if the duration of NSAIA treatment exceeds 48 hours; if oligohydramnios occurs, the drug should be discontinued and follow-up instituted according to clinical practice. Pregnant women should be advised to avoid use of NSAIAs beginning at 20 weeks' gestation unless otherwise advised by a clinician; they also should be informed that NSAIAs should be avoided beginning at 30 weeks' gestation because of the risk of premature closure of the fetal ductus arteriosus and that monitoring for oligohydramnios may be necessary if NSAIA therapy is required for longer than 48 hours' duration between about 20 and 30 weeks of gestation.
Fetal renal dysfunction resulting in oligohydramnios and, in some cases, neonatal renal impairment has been observed, on average, following days to weeks of maternal NSAIA use, although oligohydramnios has been observed infrequently as early as 48 hours after initiation of NSAIA therapy. Oligohydramnios is often, but not always, reversible following discontinuance of NSAIA therapy. Complications of prolonged oligohydramnios may include limb contracture and delayed lung maturation. A limited number of case reports have described maternal NSAIA use and neonatal renal dysfunction, in some cases irreversible, without oligohydramnios. Some cases of neonatal renal dysfunction have required treatment with invasive procedures such as exchange transfusion or dialysis. Methodologic limitations of these postmarketing studies and case reports include lack of a control group; limited information regarding dosage, duration, and timing of drug exposure; and concomitant use of other drugs. These limitations preclude establishing a reliable estimate of the risk of adverse fetal and neonatal outcomes with maternal NSAIA use. Available data on neonatal outcomes generally involved preterm infants, and the extent to which certain reported risks can be generalized to full-term infants is uncertain.
Animal data indicate that prostaglandins have an important role in endometrial vascular permeability, blastocyst implantation, and decidualization. In animal studies, inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis, such as ibuprofen, were associated with increased preimplantation and postimplantation losses. Prostaglandins also have an important role in fetal kidney development. In animal studies, inhibitors of prostaglandin synthesis impaired kidney development at clinically relevant doses.
There are no adequate and well-controlled studies of ibuprofen in pregnant women. In animal reproduction studies, no clear developmental effects were observed in rabbits or rats given ibuprofen throughout the gestational period at dosages up to 0.4 or 0.5 times, respectively, the maximum recommended human dosage (MRHD). An increase in membranous ventricular septal defects was reported in rats given ibuprofen on gestation days 9 and 10 at a dosage of 0.8 times the MRHD.
The effects of ibuprofen on labor and delivery are unknown. In studies in rats, drugs that inhibit prostaglandin synthesis, including NSAIAs, delayed parturition and increased the incidence of stillbirth.
Hydrocodone is present in human milk. Variable concentrations of hydrocodone and hydromorphone (an active metabolite) have been detected in breast milk with administration of immediate-release hydrocodone to nursing mothers in the early post-partum period. Because of the potential for serious adverse reactions, including excess sedation and respiratory depression in a breastfed infant, advise patients that breastfeeding is not recommended during treatment with hydrocodone.
Limited data indicate that ibuprofen is distributed into milk, resulting in infant exposures of 0.06-0.6% of the maternal weight-adjusted daily dosage. Adverse effects on breast-fed infants or effects on milk production have not been reported to date. The developmental and health benefits of breast-feeding should be considered along with the mother's clinical need for ibuprofen and any potential adverse effects on the breast-fed infant from the drug or from the underlying maternal condition.
In general, select dosage with caution for an elderly patient, usually starting at the low end of the dosing range, reflecting the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, or cardiac function and of concomitant disease or other drug therapy. When used for the management of pain, titrate slowly in geriatric patients and frequently reevaluate the patient for signs of CNS and respiratory depression.
The manufacturers make no specific dosage recommendations in geriatric patients; however, geriatric patients are generally at a greater risk for NSAIA-associated serious cardiovascular, GI, and/or renal adverse effects. If the expected benefits outweigh the potential risks of therapy, initiate at the lower end of the dosage range and monitor for adverse effects.
Geriatric patients may have increased sensitivity to hydrocodone. Use caution when selecting dosage. Respiratory depression is the main risk for geriatric patients treated with opioids and has occurred after administration of large initial doses in patients who were not opioid-tolerant or when opioids were co-administered with other drugs that depress respiration. Titrate dosage slowly and frequently re-evaluate patients for signs of CNS and respiratory depression.
Geriatric patients are at increased risk for NSAIA-associated serious adverse cardiovascular, GI, and renal effects. Many of the spontaneous reports of fatal adverse GI effects in patients receiving NSAIAs involve geriatric individuals. If the anticipated benefits of ibuprofen therapy outweigh the potential risks, ibuprofen should be initiated at the lower end of the dosing range and patients should be monitored for adverse effects.
Clinical studies of IV ibuprofen did not include sufficient numbers of patients >=65 years of age to determine whether geriatric patients respond differently than younger adults. Dosage should be selected with caution, starting at the low end of the dosage range, because of the greater frequency of decreased hepatic, renal, and/or cardiac function and concomitant disease and drug therapy observed in the elderly.
ICD codes
| Code | Type | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Pain | ||
| G43 | ICD10CM | Migraine |
| G43.0 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura |
| G43.00 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, not intractable |
| G43.001 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.009 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.01 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, intractable |
| G43.011 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.019 | ICD10CM | Migraine without aura, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.1 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura |
| G43.10 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, not intractable |
| G43.101 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.109 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.11 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, intractable |
| G43.111 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.119 | ICD10CM | Migraine with aura, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.4 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine |
| G43.40 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, not intractable |
| G43.401 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.409 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.41 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, intractable |
| G43.411 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.419 | ICD10CM | Hemiplegic migraine, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.5 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction |
| G43.50 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, not intractable |
| G43.501 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.509 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.51 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, intractable |
| G43.511 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.519 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura without cerebral infarction, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.6 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction |
| G43.60 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, not intractable |
| G43.601 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.609 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.61 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, intractable |
| G43.611 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.619 | ICD10CM | Persistent migraine aura with cerebral infarction, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.7 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura |
| G43.70 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, not intractable |
| G43.701 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.709 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.71 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, intractable |
| G43.711 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.719 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine without aura, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.8 | ICD10CM | Other migraine |
| G43.80 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, not intractable |
| G43.801 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.809 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.81 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, intractable |
| G43.811 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.819 | ICD10CM | Other migraine, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.82 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, not intractable |
| G43.821 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.829 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.83 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, intractable |
| G43.831 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.839 | ICD10CM | Menstrual migraine, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.9 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified |
| G43.90 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, not intractable |
| G43.901 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.909 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.91 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, intractable |
| G43.911 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.919 | ICD10CM | Migraine, unspecified, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.B | ICD10CM | Ophthalmoplegic migraine |
| G43.B0 | ICD10CM | Ophthalmoplegic migraine, not intractable |
| G43.B1 | ICD10CM | Ophthalmoplegic migraine, intractable |
| G43.C | ICD10CM | Periodic headache syndromes in child or adult |
| G43.C0 | ICD10CM | Periodic headache syndromes in child or adult, not intractable |
| G43.C1 | ICD10CM | Periodic headache syndromes in child or adult, intractable |
| G43.D | ICD10CM | Abdominal migraine |
| G43.D0 | ICD10CM | Abdominal migraine, not intractable |
| G43.D1 | ICD10CM | Abdominal migraine, intractable |
| G43.E | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura |
| G43.E0 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, not intractable |
| G43.E01 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, not intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.E09 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, not intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G43.E1 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, intractable |
| G43.E11 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, intractable, with status migrainosus |
| G43.E19 | ICD10CM | Chronic migraine with aura, intractable, without status migrainosus |
| G44 | ICD10CM | Other headache syndromes |
| G44.00 | ICD10CM | Cluster headache syndrome, unspecified |
| G44.001 | ICD10CM | Cluster headache syndrome, unspecified, intractable |
| G44.009 | ICD10CM | Cluster headache syndrome, unspecified, not intractable |
| G44.01 | ICD10CM | Episodic cluster headache |
| G44.011 | ICD10CM | Episodic cluster headache, intractable |
| G44.019 | ICD10CM | Episodic cluster headache, not intractable |
| G44.02 | ICD10CM | Chronic cluster headache |
| G44.021 | ICD10CM | Chronic cluster headache, intractable |
| G44.029 | ICD10CM | Chronic cluster headache, not intractable |
| G44.03 | ICD10CM | Episodic paroxysmal hemicrania |
| G44.031 | ICD10CM | Episodic paroxysmal hemicrania, intractable |
| G44.039 | ICD10CM | Episodic paroxysmal hemicrania, not intractable |
| G44.04 | ICD10CM | Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania |
| G44.041 | ICD10CM | Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, intractable |
| G44.049 | ICD10CM | Chronic paroxysmal hemicrania, not intractable |
| G44.05 | ICD10CM | Short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCt) |
| G44.051 | ICD10CM | Short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCt), intractable |
| G44.059 | ICD10CM | Short lasting unilateral neuralgiform headache with conjunctival injection and tearing (SUNCt), not intractable |
| G44.1 | ICD10CM | Vascular headache, not elsewhere classified |
| G44.2 | ICD10CM | Tension-type headache |
| G44.20 | ICD10CM | Tension-type headache, unspecified |
| G44.201 | ICD10CM | Tension-type headache, unspecified, intractable |
| G44.209 | ICD10CM | Tension-type headache, unspecified, not intractable |
| G44.21 | ICD10CM | Episodic tension-type headache |
| G44.211 | ICD10CM | Episodic tension-type headache, intractable |
| G44.219 | ICD10CM | Episodic tension-type headache, not intractable |
| G44.22 | ICD10CM | Chronic tension-type headache |
| G44.221 | ICD10CM | Chronic tension-type headache, intractable |
| G44.229 | ICD10CM | Chronic tension-type headache, not intractable |
| G44.3 | ICD10CM | Post-traumatic headache |
| G44.30 | ICD10CM | Post-traumatic headache, unspecified |
| G44.301 | ICD10CM | Post-traumatic headache, unspecified, intractable |
| G44.309 | ICD10CM | Post-traumatic headache, unspecified, not intractable |
| G44.31 | ICD10CM | Acute post-traumatic headache |
| G44.311 | ICD10CM | Acute post-traumatic headache, intractable |
| G44.319 | ICD10CM | Acute post-traumatic headache, not intractable |
| G44.32 | ICD10CM | Chronic post-traumatic headache |
| G44.321 | ICD10CM | Chronic post-traumatic headache, intractable |
| G44.329 | ICD10CM | Chronic post-traumatic headache, not intractable |
| G44.4 | ICD10CM | Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified |
| G44.40 | ICD10CM | Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified, not intractable |
| G44.41 | ICD10CM | Drug-induced headache, not elsewhere classified, intractable |
| G44.5 | ICD10CM | Complicated headache syndromes |
| G44.51 | ICD10CM | Hemicrania continua |
| G44.52 | ICD10CM | New daily persistent headache (NDPh) |
| G44.53 | ICD10CM | Primary thunderclap headache |
| G44.59 | ICD10CM | Other complicated headache syndrome |
| G44.8 | ICD10CM | Other specified headache syndromes |
| G44.81 | ICD10CM | Hypnic headache |
| G44.82 | ICD10CM | Headache associated with sexual activity |
| G44.83 | ICD10CM | Primary cough headache |
| G44.84 | ICD10CM | Primary exertional headache |
| G44.85 | ICD10CM | Primary stabbing headache |
| G44.86 | ICD10CM | Cervicogenic headache |
| G44.89 | ICD10CM | Other headache syndrome |
| G50.1 | ICD10CM | Atypical facial pain |
| G89 | ICD10CM | Pain, not elsewhere classified |
| G89.0 | ICD10CM | Central pain syndrome |
| G89.1 | ICD10CM | Acute pain, not elsewhere classified |
| G89.11 | ICD10CM | Acute pain due to trauma |
| G89.12 | ICD10CM | Acute post-thoracotomy pain |
| G89.18 | ICD10CM | Other acute postprocedural pain |
| G89.2 | ICD10CM | Chronic pain, not elsewhere classified |
| G89.21 | ICD10CM | Chronic pain due to trauma |
| G89.22 | ICD10CM | Chronic post-thoracotomy pain |
| G89.28 | ICD10CM | Other chronic postprocedural pain |
| G89.29 | ICD10CM | Other chronic pain |
| G89.3 | ICD10CM | Neoplasm related pain (acute) (chronic) |
| G89.4 | ICD10CM | Chronic pain syndrome |
| G90.5 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS i) |
| G90.50 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome i, unspecified |
| G90.51 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of upper limb |
| G90.511 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of right upper limb |
| G90.512 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of left upper limb |
| G90.513 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of upper limb, bilateral |
| G90.519 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of unspecified upper limb |
| G90.52 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of lower limb |
| G90.521 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of right lower limb |
| G90.522 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of left lower limb |
| G90.523 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of lower limb, bilateral |
| G90.529 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of unspecified lower limb |
| G90.59 | ICD10CM | Complex regional pain syndrome I of other specified site |
| H57.1 | ICD10CM | Ocular pain |
| H57.10 | ICD10CM | Ocular pain, unspecified eye |
| H57.11 | ICD10CM | Ocular pain, right eye |
| H57.12 | ICD10CM | Ocular pain, left eye |
| H57.13 | ICD10CM | Ocular pain, bilateral |
| H92 | ICD10CM | Otalgia and effusion of ear |
| H92.0 | ICD10CM | Otalgia |
| H92.01 | ICD10CM | Otalgia, right ear |
| H92.02 | ICD10CM | Otalgia, left ear |
| H92.03 | ICD10CM | Otalgia, bilateral |
| H92.09 | ICD10CM | Otalgia, unspecified ear |
| K14.6 | ICD10CM | Glossodynia |
| M25.5 | ICD10CM | Pain in joint |
| M25.50 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified joint |
| M25.51 | ICD10CM | Pain in shoulder |
| M25.511 | ICD10CM | Pain in right shoulder |
| M25.512 | ICD10CM | Pain in left shoulder |
| M25.519 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified shoulder |
| M25.52 | ICD10CM | Pain in elbow |
| M25.521 | ICD10CM | Pain in right elbow |
| M25.522 | ICD10CM | Pain in left elbow |
| M25.529 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified elbow |
| M25.53 | ICD10CM | Pain in wrist |
| M25.531 | ICD10CM | Pain in right wrist |
| M25.532 | ICD10CM | Pain in left wrist |
| M25.539 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified wrist |
| M25.54 | ICD10CM | Pain in joints of hand |
| M25.541 | ICD10CM | Pain in joints of right hand |
| M25.542 | ICD10CM | Pain in joints of left hand |
| M25.549 | ICD10CM | Pain in joints of unspecified hand |
| M25.55 | ICD10CM | Pain in hip |
| M25.551 | ICD10CM | Pain in right hip |
| M25.552 | ICD10CM | Pain in left hip |
| M25.559 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified hip |
| M25.56 | ICD10CM | Pain in knee |
| M25.561 | ICD10CM | Pain in right knee |
| M25.562 | ICD10CM | Pain in left knee |
| M25.569 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified knee |
| M25.57 | ICD10CM | Pain in ankle and joints of foot |
| M25.571 | ICD10CM | Pain in right ankle and joints of right foot |
| M25.572 | ICD10CM | Pain in left ankle and joints of left foot |
| M25.579 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified ankle and joints of unspecified foot |
| M25.59 | ICD10CM | Pain in other specified joint |
| M26.62 | ICD10CM | Arthralgia of temporomandibular joint |
| M26.621 | ICD10CM | Arthralgia of right temporomandibular joint |
| M26.622 | ICD10CM | Arthralgia of left temporomandibular joint |
| M26.623 | ICD10CM | Arthralgia of bilateral temporomandibular joint |
| M26.629 | ICD10CM | Arthralgia of temporomandibular joint, unspecified side |
| M54 | ICD10CM | Dorsalgia |
| M54.2 | ICD10CM | Cervicalgia |
| M54.4 | ICD10CM | Lumbago with sciatica |
| M54.40 | ICD10CM | Lumbago with sciatica, unspecified side |
| M54.41 | ICD10CM | Lumbago with sciatica, right side |
| M54.42 | ICD10CM | Lumbago with sciatica, left side |
| M54.5 | ICD10CM | Low back pain |
| M54.50 | ICD10CM | Low back pain, unspecified |
| M54.51 | ICD10CM | Vertebrogenic low back pain |
| M54.59 | ICD10CM | Other low back pain |
| M54.6 | ICD10CM | Pain in thoracic spine |
| M54.8 | ICD10CM | Other dorsalgia |
| M54.89 | ICD10CM | Other dorsalgia |
| M54.9 | ICD10CM | Dorsalgia, unspecified |
| M77.4 | ICD10CM | Metatarsalgia |
| M77.40 | ICD10CM | Metatarsalgia, unspecified foot |
| M77.41 | ICD10CM | Metatarsalgia, right foot |
| M77.42 | ICD10CM | Metatarsalgia, left foot |
| M79.1 | ICD10CM | Myalgia |
| M79.10 | ICD10CM | Myalgia, unspecified site |
| M79.11 | ICD10CM | Myalgia of mastication muscle |
| M79.12 | ICD10CM | Myalgia of auxiliary muscles, head and neck |
| M79.18 | ICD10CM | Myalgia, other site |
| M79.6 | ICD10CM | Pain in limb, hand, foot, fingers and toes |
| M79.60 | ICD10CM | Pain in limb, unspecified |
| M79.601 | ICD10CM | Pain in right arm |
| M79.602 | ICD10CM | Pain in left arm |
| M79.603 | ICD10CM | Pain in arm, unspecified |
| M79.604 | ICD10CM | Pain in right leg |
| M79.605 | ICD10CM | Pain in left leg |
| M79.606 | ICD10CM | Pain in leg, unspecified |
| M79.609 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified limb |
| M79.62 | ICD10CM | Pain in upper arm |
| M79.621 | ICD10CM | Pain in right upper arm |
| M79.622 | ICD10CM | Pain in left upper arm |
| M79.629 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified upper arm |
| M79.63 | ICD10CM | Pain in forearm |
| M79.631 | ICD10CM | Pain in right forearm |
| M79.632 | ICD10CM | Pain in left forearm |
| M79.639 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified forearm |
| M79.64 | ICD10CM | Pain in hand and fingers |
| M79.641 | ICD10CM | Pain in right hand |
| M79.642 | ICD10CM | Pain in left hand |
| M79.643 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified hand |
| M79.644 | ICD10CM | Pain in right finger(s) |
| M79.645 | ICD10CM | Pain in left finger(s) |
| M79.646 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified finger(s) |
| M79.65 | ICD10CM | Pain in thigh |
| M79.651 | ICD10CM | Pain in right thigh |
| M79.652 | ICD10CM | Pain in left thigh |
| M79.659 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified thigh |
| M79.66 | ICD10CM | Pain in lower leg |
| M79.661 | ICD10CM | Pain in right lower leg |
| M79.662 | ICD10CM | Pain in left lower leg |
| M79.669 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified lower leg |
| M79.67 | ICD10CM | Pain in foot and toes |
| M79.671 | ICD10CM | Pain in right foot |
| M79.672 | ICD10CM | Pain in left foot |
| M79.673 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified foot |
| M79.674 | ICD10CM | Pain in right toe(s) |
| M79.675 | ICD10CM | Pain in left toe(s) |
| M79.676 | ICD10CM | Pain in unspecified toe(s) |
| N23 | ICD10CM | Unspecified renal colic |
| N64.4 | ICD10CM | Mastodynia |
| N94 | ICD10CM | Pain and other conditions associated with female genital organs and menstrual cycle |
| N94.0 | ICD10CM | Mittelschmerz |
| N94.3 | ICD10CM | Premenstrual tension syndrome |
| N94.4 | ICD10CM | Primary dysmenorrhea |
| N94.5 | ICD10CM | Secondary dysmenorrhea |
| N94.6 | ICD10CM | Dysmenorrhea, unspecified |
| R07 | ICD10CM | Pain in throat and chest |
| R07.0 | ICD10CM | Pain in throat |
| R07.1 | ICD10CM | Chest pain on breathing |
| R07.2 | ICD10CM | Precordial pain |
| R07.81 | ICD10CM | Pleurodynia |
| R07.82 | ICD10CM | Intercostal pain |
| R07.89 | ICD10CM | Other chest pain |
| R07.9 | ICD10CM | Chest pain, unspecified |
| R10 | ICD10CM | Abdominal and pelvic pain |
| R10.0 | ICD10CM | Acute abdomen |
| R10.1 | ICD10CM | Pain localized to upper abdomen |
| R10.10 | ICD10CM | Upper abdominal pain, unspecified |
| R10.11 | ICD10CM | Right upper quadrant pain |
| R10.12 | ICD10CM | Left upper quadrant pain |
| R10.2 | ICD10CM | Pelvic and perineal pain |
| R10.20 | ICD10CM | Pelvic and perineal pain unspecified side |
| R10.21 | ICD10CM | Pelvic and perineal pain right side |
| R10.22 | ICD10CM | Pelvic and perineal pain left side |
| R10.23 | ICD10CM | Pelvic and perineal pain bilateral |
| R10.24 | ICD10CM | Suprapubic pain |
| R10.3 | ICD10CM | Pain localized to other parts of lower abdomen |
| R10.30 | ICD10CM | Lower abdominal pain, unspecified |
| R10.31 | ICD10CM | Right lower quadrant pain |
| R10.32 | ICD10CM | Left lower quadrant pain |
| R10.33 | ICD10CM | Periumbilical pain |
| R10.8 | ICD10CM | Other abdominal pain |
| R10.83 | ICD10CM | Colic |
| R10.84 | ICD10CM | Generalized abdominal pain |
| R10.85 | ICD10CM | Abdominal pain of multiple sites |
| R10.9 | ICD10CM | Unspecified abdominal pain |
| R10.A | ICD10CM | Pain localized to flank |
| R10.A0 | ICD10CM | Flank pain, unspecified side |
| R10.A1 | ICD10CM | Flank pain, right side |
| R10.A2 | ICD10CM | Flank pain, left side |
| R10.A3 | ICD10CM | Flank pain, bilateral |
| R51 | ICD10CM | Headache |
| R51.0 | ICD10CM | Headache with orthostatic component, not elsewhere classified |
| R51.9 | ICD10CM | Headache, unspecified |
| R52 | ICD10CM | Pain, unspecified |
| R68.84 | ICD10CM | Jaw pain |
| T82.84 | ICD10CM | Pain due to cardiac and vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T82.847 | ICD10CM | Pain due to cardiac prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T82.847A | ICD10CM | Pain due to cardiac prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T82.847D | ICD10CM | Pain due to cardiac prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
| T82.848 | ICD10CM | Pain due to vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T82.848A | ICD10CM | Pain due to vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T82.848D | ICD10CM | Pain due to vascular prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
| T83.84 | ICD10CM | Pain due to genitourinary prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T83.84xA | ICD10CM | Pain due to genitourinary prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T83.84xD | ICD10CM | Pain due to genitourinary prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
| T84.84 | ICD10CM | Pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T84.84xA | ICD10CM | Pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T84.84xD | ICD10CM | Pain due to internal orthopedic prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
| T85.84 | ICD10CM | Pain due to internal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, not elsewhere classified |
| T85.840 | ICD10CM | Pain due to nervous system prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T85.840A | ICD10CM | Pain due to nervous system prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T85.840D | ICD10CM | Pain due to nervous system prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
| T85.848 | ICD10CM | Pain due to other internal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts |
| T85.848A | ICD10CM | Pain due to other internal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, initial encounter |
| T85.848D | ICD10CM | Pain due to other internal prosthetic devices, implants and grafts, subsequent encounter |
ICD code information from First Databank (FDB).
Formulary status
Search health-plan coverage for this drug by ZIP code.
Choose the first character of a health plan name.
Last reviewed · Source: First Databank (FDB) drug data
On this page
Actions
Sign in to save favorites
Saving this drug requires a free Physicians Office Resource account.